East Ukraine conflict claimed nearly 3,000 civilian lives — ICRCWorld August 20, 1:56
Renowned Russian filmmaker Andrei Konchalovsky turns 80Society & Culture August 20, 0:48
Netanyahu expects to meet with Putin in Sochi on August 23 — Israeli premier’s officeRussian Politics & Diplomacy August 19, 22:47
Surgut attacker is identified as a local resident - investigationSociety & Culture August 19, 14:09
Combat module containing neural networks may become series in Russia in 2018 — designerMilitary & Defense August 19, 10:44
Russian Head of General Staff Gerasimov hands award weapon to Syrian generalMilitary & Defense August 19, 9:10
German politician says Crimea should to be recognized as part of RussiaWorld August 19, 6:22
Russian Emergencies Ministry carries out over 430 humanitarian missions abroad since 1993Society & Culture August 19, 6:18
Olympic diving champion Zakharov to carry Russia’s flag at opening ceremony of UniversiadeSport August 19, 4:11
KIEV, May 18. /TASS/. Kiev’s Obolonsky District Court has denied a request from the defense attorneys of the former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich to organize a video conference with him through the international legal assistance procedure. A decision on the issue was made on Thursday.
"Concerning international legal assistance to subpoena the defendant and filing a request with the Russian Ministry of Justice and the Rostov Regional Court, the court ruled to deny (the defense attorneys') request," the judge announced.
At the same time, the court granted part of the defense’s motion requesting clarification for the previous decision of May 4, which entertained a request for the former Ukrainian president to participate in a trial via video conference. "To grant the petition and provide explanations," the judge said.
According to Yanukovich’s defense attorney Vitaly Serdyuk, organizing a video conference without explanations is impossible, since it is necessary to clarify a number of issues, including how the identity of the ex-president will be established during the video conference.
The lawyer also asked for a break in the trial to convey the court’s position to his client, but it was turned down.