Ministry reports US spy agencies' latest attempt to recruit Russian worker was on Jan 14Russian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 21:57
Austria’s president-elect says he is ready to maintain good relations with RussiaWorld January 18, 21:50
Putin briefs Merkel, Hollande on steps to implement Syrian ceasefireRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 20:39
Putin, Merkel, Hollande agree to give fresh impetus to Normandy Four activitiesRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 20:26
Russian Eurobonds may be floated in spring 2017 — finance ministerBusiness & Economy January 18, 19:48
Russia, Turkey report 14 ceasefire breaches in Syria per dayWorld January 18, 19:17
Analyst believes removal of sanctions can be political bargaining chip with RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 18:45
Arctic Forum’s task is to change perception of region as source of raw material — officialBusiness & Economy January 18, 18:28
OPEC revises Russia’s oil production outlook downward by 110,000 bpd in 2017Business & Economy January 18, 18:20
KIEV, June 19. /TASS/. Ukraine’s Constitutional Court has ruled that the bill on depriving deputies and judges of immunity complies with the country’s constitution, a local news agency reported on Friday.
"The Constitutional Court has acknowledged that the bill on canceling immunity of deputies and limiting immunity of judges is constitutional," the Ukrainskiye Novosti (Ukrainian News) agency said.
The bill now needs to be adopted at the next session of the parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, by at least two thirds of MPs or 300 votes.
In early February, the parliament adopted a bill on amending the country’s constitution by depriving deputies and judges of immunity. It took the Constitutional Court more than two months to consider the document, which amends the country’s key law.
The bill suggests excluding from article 80 of Ukraine’s Constitution parts on guarantying deputy immunity. Besides, article 129 of the Constitution is added by a provision that a judge cannot be detained or arrested without the consent of the High Justice Council before an indictment sentence is passed by court. The exception is the case when a judge is detained while committing or shortly after committing a grave or particularly grave crime against a human life.