Putin rejects West’s accusations of Russia’s aggressivenessRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 15:57
Putin comments on recent protestsRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 15:49
Scientists streamline data transmission through self-assembling wireless networkScience & Space March 30, 15:41
Putin blasts attempts to restrict Russian ambassador's contacts with US politiciansRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 15:29
Putin says Russia wants to build good relations with USRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 15:04
Putin stresses Russia’s commitment to comply with Paris climate agreementsRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 14:56
Burger King dishes out nearly $2,000 in fines for not giving customer free cherry pieSociety & Culture March 30, 14:55
Foreign Ministry slams US media smear campaign against Russian diplomats as ‘threat’Russian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 14:49
Moscow promises to ensure security of Arctic cooperation partnersRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 14:35
KIEV, June 19. /TASS/. Ukraine’s Constitutional Court has ruled that the bill on depriving deputies and judges of immunity complies with the country’s constitution, a local news agency reported on Friday.
"The Constitutional Court has acknowledged that the bill on canceling immunity of deputies and limiting immunity of judges is constitutional," the Ukrainskiye Novosti (Ukrainian News) agency said.
The bill now needs to be adopted at the next session of the parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, by at least two thirds of MPs or 300 votes.
In early February, the parliament adopted a bill on amending the country’s constitution by depriving deputies and judges of immunity. It took the Constitutional Court more than two months to consider the document, which amends the country’s key law.
The bill suggests excluding from article 80 of Ukraine’s Constitution parts on guarantying deputy immunity. Besides, article 129 of the Constitution is added by a provision that a judge cannot be detained or arrested without the consent of the High Justice Council before an indictment sentence is passed by court. The exception is the case when a judge is detained while committing or shortly after committing a grave or particularly grave crime against a human life.