Russian Airborne Force ex-commander admits possibility of NATO’s attack on eastern flankRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 20, 11:45
Russian MP says Moscow expects cooperation with Trump in war on terrorRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 20, 11:18
Russian manufacturer ready to extend serial production of newest T-90MS tankMilitary & Defense February 20, 10:14
Russia, US should start with minor steps to restore ties — US expertWorld February 20, 8:38
Vitaly Saveliev: Aeroflot out in the openBusiness & Economy February 20, 8:00
Ambassador says Qatar interested in joining Astana talks on SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 20, 7:30
Russia’s Dmitriev takes gold in sprint at 2017 UCI Track Cycling World Cup in ColombiaSport February 20, 3:40
Lenin Moreno leads after 1st round of presidential election in Ecuador — exit pollsWorld February 20, 2:31
Emelianenko-Mitrione bout postponed due to American’s illnessSport February 19, 4:06
GENEVA, June 1 (Itar-Tass) —— Russia strongly condemns the Houla crime but opposes the use of mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council in its investigation, Russian Permanent Representative to the Geneva headquarters of the UN and other international organizations Alexei Borodavkin told Itar-Tass on Friday.
He thus explained why Russia voted down the resolution dedicated to the Houla events, where more than 100 civilians were slain on May 25.
This vote “does not mean the absence of our condemnation,” Borodavkin said. “The draft was not balanced; it was partial and contained a number of one-sided evaluations. It lacked many significant elements, which should have been included in such document, such as condemnation of terrorism. It did not even mention the important work the UN observers were doing in Syria. The resolution went beyond the mandate of the UN Human Rights Council and actually anticipated results of the Houla investigation. Therefore it disagreed with the UN Security Council press release of May 27,” he said.
The Russian amendments to the resolution were not supported, and the resolution “contained plenty of wordings, which disavowed the very idea of independent investigation by putting the blame on one side straightforwardly,” he said.
“We do not need to broaden the mandate of the independent investigative commission, because the UN Observation Mission in Syria is already holding the investigation by the order of the Un Security Council. There should be no duplication of this work and consequent calling into question of the mission’s competence,” he said.
The diplomat expressed concern that the resolution “might display an imbalanced attitude of the Council to the Syrian situation, build up confrontation in that country and destabilize the region.”
“The only way out of the Syrian crisis, including its human rights component, is demilitarization of the conflict through pressure on the sides for the termination of violence and unwavering support to the Kofi Annan plan. Russia will stick to this position and calls on other states to do the same,” Borodavkin stressed.
The resolution was drafted by Qatar, Kuwait, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the United States and the European Union and supported by the majority of members of the UN Human Rights Council. The investigative commission formed in August 2011 to monitor possible violations of human rights in Syria was entrusted to make a report on the Houla incident already by the 20th session of the Council due on June 18-July 6.
Forty-one out of 47 delegations supported the resolution, three (Russia, China and Cuba) were against and two abstained (Ecuador and Uganda).