Syrian diplomat stresses Khan Shaykhun incident staged by militantsWorld August 16, 15:46
EU, Russia and Turkey among Ukraine’s biggest trade export partnersBusiness & Economy August 16, 15:42
Russia-US cooperation in space must be pragmatic and without sanctions — senior officialScience & Space August 16, 15:20
George Martin admits he is afraid of Game of Thrones spoilersSociety & Culture August 16, 15:09
George R. R. Martin says he has no political ambitionsSociety & Culture August 16, 14:53
Russia, Bolivia to boost energy cooperationBusiness & Economy August 16, 14:43
Syrian army finds UK and US chemical agents at depots captured from terroristsMilitary & Defense August 16, 14:30
George Martin reveals HBO plans for Game of Thrones universe after show is overSociety & Culture August 16, 13:53
More than one-third of Russians claim they do not drink alcohol — pollSociety & Culture August 16, 13:33
RIGA, November 24 (Itar-Tass) — Administrative district court in Riga on Friday answered a lawsuit by the organization of the Latvian Waffen SS legion -- Daugavas Vanagi /The Hawks of the Daugava/ -- against the Riga City Hall and told the latter to bring public apologies to the SS veterans for an unlawful prohibition of their traditional annual march in downtown Riga March 16, 2011.
The court ruling was revealed to reporters by Inese Deme, an assistant to the Chief Justice.
She said that Daugavas Vanagi also demand a compensation for moral damage in the amount of $ 10,000, but the court turned the demand down.
The City Hall is expected to publish the apologies in local dailies within a month after the court's ruling takes effect. Under the Latvian law, the City Hall can appeal the ruling at Latvia's Supreme Court within a period of 30 days.
Ugis Vidauskis, a spokesman for public relations, told reporters in the meantime the City Hall plans launching an appeal.
"We believe were acted on the grounds of law upon getting conclusions of law enforcement agencies, which said these functions might pose danger to public law and order," he said. "That's why the City Hall doesn't find the court's ruling to be correct."