IAAF approves application of three Russians to compete as neutral athletesSport February 24, 1:43
US lawmakers present no evidence of Russia’s interference in US election - Russian MPRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 23, 21:42
Russia to continue strengthen its Armed Forces - PutinRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 23, 21:37
4,000 Russian nationals fight among militants in Syria - PutinRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 23, 21:31
Opposition’s demand of Assad’s immediate resignation absurd - Russian envoy to GenevaRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 23, 16:34
Moscow celebrates Defender of the Fatherland DaySociety & Culture February 23, 16:19
ISS astronauts capture Dragon with manipulatorScience & Space February 23, 14:36
Vitaly Churkin’s body delivered to RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 23, 12:30
Ukrainian military shell Donetsk water purification plantWorld February 23, 11:45
STRASBOURG, June 19 (Itar-Tass) — Russian authorities did not breach the obligation to hold a free parliamentary election in 2003, the European Court for Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on Tuesday.
The court said the obligation was not breached although there was no equality of candidates by television coverage. That circumstance was not sufficient for acknowledging the election as not free, the court said.
The court said that effective laws gave the opposition the minimal access to television coverage and established the principle of neutrality of state-controlled media.
The court ruled that Russia had taken a number of measures to ensure a certain degree of the opposition presence on television and independence and neutrality of the media.
A number of opposition parties, including the Russian Communist Party and Yabloko, appealed to the Strasbourg Court. They said the State Duma election in 2003 was not free because of the unjust coverage of the election campaign by five federal channels.