Republicans warn Trump against hasty deal with Iran — Politico

World May 27, 7:53

According to sources cited by the newspaper, the officials fear that the deal terms would be unfavorable for Washington

WASHINGTON, May 27. /TASS/. A number of influential Republican party congresspeople warn US President Donald Trump against concluding a peace agreement with Iran in haste, fearing that its terms may be unfavorable for Washington, the Politico newspaper reported.

"President Donald Trump’s push for an Iran peace deal faces opposition from a surprising quarter: Republican hawks who fear the White House will strike a bad deal," the article says. "Top Republicans warned that a hasty deal could leave Iran with the tools to still threaten the region and choke off commercial traffic in the Strait of Hormuz."

"Major sticking points would include the future of Iran’s nuclear program, including its stock of highly enriched uranium, and clearing the way for maritime transit of the strait," Politico wrote.

"Several top Republicans are pushing the administration to abandon talks and keep the pressure on Iran," the article says.

Among them are Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (Mississippi), who earlier urged to resume bombings of Iran. In turn, Senator Thom Tillis (North Carolina) said the US administration has "a lot of things that need to be explained" regarding the potential agreement with Iran.

The United States and Israel launched a military operation against Iran on February 28. On April 7, Trump announced a "double-sided" two-week ceasefire with Iran. On April 11, the parties held several rounds of talks in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. According to both Tehran and Washington, they were unable to agree on a long-term solution to the conflict due to multiple disagreements.

On April 21, the US president announced plans to extend the ceasefire with Iran. On May 19, Trump said the US was ready to give diplomacy a chance, postponing military operations until the beginning of next week.

On May 23, the US leader stated that an agreement had been largely negotiated, but he said the following day that the sides had not yet reached final agreements on several issues.

Read more on the site →