Russian permanent mission to EU explains reasons behind warrant for ICC judges
The diplomatic mission noted that Brussels ignores the fact that Russia is not a member of the International Criminal Court and is not bound by obligations under this treaty
BRUSSELS, May 24. /TASS/. Russia’s Permanent Mission to the European Union explained to Brussels how the International Criminal Court (ICC) violated the law and why warrants were issued in Russia for ICC prosecutor and judges.
"The ICC has jurisdiction over countries that ratified the Rome Statute. Brussels pointedly ignores the fact that the Russian Federation is not a party to the ICC and is not bound by any obligations under the treaty. Therefore, the actions of the International Criminal Court, not Russia, are politically motivated and baseless," the mission said in a comment, published on Tuesday. "The ‘warrants’ issued by a quasi-judicial body for the arrest of Russian representatives violate international legal norms on immunities of foreign officials and lack any legal or factual basis."
Commenting on EU External Action Service’s claims that Russia was "intimidating" ICC members, the mission said: "Our country is not ‘intimidating’ anyone, as Brussels tries to portray it. The Russian Investigative Committee has initiated criminal cases against the ICC prosecutor and its three judges who were involved in issuing unlawful warrants."
"Russia has put the afore-mentioned persons on the wanted list for bringing criminal proceedings against knowingly innocent Russian citizens and preparing to attack representatives of a foreign state enjoying international protection, in order to complicate international relations, which violates a number of the Russian Criminal Code provisions (namely articles 299(2), 30(1), 301(2) and 360(2) thereof)," the Russian diplomats said.
"Describing the ICC as ‘an independent and impartial judicial institution’ is on the conscience of the statement’s authors," the mission added. "The EU has long forgotten what international law is and instead follows a so-called ‘rules-based order.’ Furthermore, these rules have been invented by a limited number of Western states - neither have they been discussed within universal international fora, nor are they laid down anywhere."
Situation around ICC
On May 21, Russia’s Investigative Committee charged in absentia the prosecutor and judge of the International Criminal Court (ICC) who issued a warrant for the arrest of Russian President Vladimir Putin and children’s rights ombudswoman Maria Lvova-Belova.
Earlier, the Committee initiated a criminal case against prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Karim Ahmad Khan, judges of the International Criminal Court Tomoko Akane, Rosario Salvatore Aitala, and Sergio Gerardo Ugalde Godinez.
On March 17, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin and Children’s Rights Commissioner Maria Lvova-Belova on charges of "unlawful deportation" of Ukrainian children to Russia. On March 20, Russia’s Investigative Committee opened a criminal case against the ICC prosecutor and judges, saying that their actions are unlawful as there were no grounds to bring the Russian president and children’s rights ombudswoman to criminal liability.
Under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons of December 14, 1973, heads of state enjoy absolute immunity from foreign states’ jurisdiction.