Putin and Erdogan give positive assessment to joint efforts in Astana processWorld October 21, 3:03
Privileges to certain languages in Ukraine’s education law to worsen situation — diplomatRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 20, 21:46
International balance of forces in Syria after Raqqa’s liberation unclear yet — expertMilitary & Defense October 20, 21:05
Russia to resume import of aubergines, pomegranates from Turkey since October 30Business & Economy October 20, 20:18
International station to orbit Moon at 70,000 km distance from EarthScience & Space October 20, 20:09
US indulging in lies to have UN-OPCW mission’s mandate extended — Foreign MinistryRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 20, 19:31
This week in photos: Diplomatic kiss, Paddington's dance and French bank in flamesSociety & Culture October 20, 17:46
Scientific team unlocks secret to supercaps’ vast capacity as ‘the battery of the future’Science & Space October 20, 17:40
Russian economy’s losses from cyber threats may surge fourfold in two yearsBusiness & Economy October 20, 16:52
KIEV, September 7. /TASS/. Kiev’s appeal court on Wednesday refused to recognize "the Russian Federation’s armed aggression" in Crimea and eastern Ukraine and dismissed the lawsuit of lawyer and rights advocate Stanislav Batrin.
The relevant court ruling was published on the Otkryty Sud (open court) website.
"The court refused to grant Stanislav Batrin’s request to establish the fact of Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine, dismissing eight requests of the complainant," the report said.
Thus, the court upheld the ruling of the first instance court. Kiev’s Shevchenkovsky court on May 12 refused to recognize "the armed aggression of the Russian Federation" against Ukraine, saying the fact does not affect the complainant’s rights.
The Ukrainian presidential administration adhered to that position both in the first instance court and during the appeal hearing, Batrin said.
"The prosecutor general’s office did not object to the granting of the request, but the president, in the person of his representative, flatly insisted on the refusal in establishment of the fact of armed aggression," he said.
Besides the Ukrainian president, the Ukrainian Security Service, the defense, foreign and justice ministries, the prosecutor general’s office and the Russian Federation’s embassy in Ukraine take part in the case.
The complainant said he plans to appeal the appeal court’s ruling in a cassation authority.
The West and Ukraine have accused Russia of destabilizing Ukraine. Moscow has constantly dismissed allegations that Russia could in any way be involved in destabilization in the neighboring country.