Russian economy overcomes stagnation — PutinBusiness & Economy October 24, 14:28
Ukrainian Jews point to Poroshenko’s Nazi photo blunder on TwitterWorld October 24, 13:51
Russian ‘It Girl’ candidate wants to change the rules of the game in 2018 electionRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 13:42
Moscow court arrests radio host’s attacker for two monthsSociety & Culture October 24, 13:37
Kremlin urges public to avoid tinging Ekho Moskvy attack with political intrigueRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 13:18
Press review: Iraq, Russia to deepen ties and Syrian opposition, Damascus eye direct talksPress Review October 24, 13:00
Regiment of S-400 to enter duty in Sevastopol in February 2018Military & Defense October 24, 12:51
Serbian defense chief blasts US ‘ultimatum’ to choose between Russia or WestWorld October 24, 12:49
Russia to increase gas production by 12%, coal by 6% in 2017Business & Economy October 24, 12:47
MOSCOW, February 8 /TASS/. The inter-Syrian talks, which are resuming in Geneva on February 25, are unlikely to succeed if the Syrian army does not win on the ground, Russian experts told a roundtable meeting (the Unsuccessful Start of the Syria Peace Talks: Possible Consequences) held on Monday.
"Victory on the ground, which I believe will occur in the next few months, is necessary to ensure the success of the inter-Syrian talks in Geneva," Vladimir Yevseyev, the head of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) department of the Institute of CIS Studies, said.
"That is why I do not believe that a compromise is possible on February 25 because so far there are no conditions for the Syrian national army to gain a convincing victory," Yevseyev said.
"It is necessary to go ahead with the talks in the course of these months at least for the purpose of formulating a common stance, which will allow the sides to reach a compromise," the expert concluded.
Another participant in the roundtable meeting, Amur Gadzhiyev, research associate of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Oriental Studies, said, in turn, that all the parties in the Syrian conflict wanted to settle [the crisis] as soon as possible.
"However, each of the parties in conflict keeps believing that it [the conflict] will be resolved in its favor and on its terms," Gadzhiyev explained.
He believes that the Syrian army’s success in cutting off the main supply routes for the militants in the north of the Syrian province of Aleppo was one of the root causes behind the poor start of the inter-Syrian talks.
"The Syrian opposition, which fears that the retreat on the front might result in significant concessions at the talks, decided for itself [an on advice from international sponsors] that it was not the best time to continue the talks. This, in my view, is one of the main reasons for the abortive start of the Geneva negotiations," Gadzhiyev said.
The inter-Syrian negotiations, which began in Geneva in the first days of February, were suspended days later until February 25. UN Special Envoy on Syria Staffan de Mistura said that the sides had focused on discussing procedural issues rather than on the solution of concrete tasks.