Russian senior MP calls on EU politicians not to hide heads in sand in Syrian settlementRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 26, 18:09
Three Russian fans stabbed after football match in BelgradeSport March 26, 3:28
Russia ready to take part in restoring oil production in Syria - energy ministerBusiness & Economy March 26, 3:27
Moscow disappointed over new US sanctions against Russian companies - Foreign MinistryRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 26, 1:28
US sanctions 8 Russian companies over non-proliferation lawWorld March 25, 21:53
Russia's Defense Ministry says US-led coalition unlikely to launch battle for Raqqa soonRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 25, 19:06
Russia cuts oil production by 185,000 barrels per day as of today — energy ministerBusiness & Economy March 25, 18:30
OPEC has no objections to speed of Russia's oil production cutsBusiness & Economy March 25, 12:38
Opposition leader Vladimir Neklyayev detained in Belarus - news agency directorWorld March 25, 5:33
THE HAGUE, January 11. /TASS/. Ukrainian oil producer Ukrnafta and 11 other Ukrainian companies applied to international arbitration with claims against Russia. This is evidenced by documents posted on Monday on the website of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague.
Proceedings were initiated in connection with the Russian-Ukrainian agreement on incentivization and mutual protection of investments dd. November 27, 1998. No specific information was indicated regarding claims of Ukrainian companies.
The Russian side did not recognize the jurisdiction of the international arbitration and did not appoint its representatives for the proceedings.
Further to Ukrnafta, Ukraine’s Stabil, Rubenor, Rustel, Novel-Estate, Kirovograd-Nafta, Crimea-Petrol, Pirsan, Trade-Trust, Elefteria, Satek and Stemv Group also applied to arbitration.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague said on January 6 that the arbitration started trying the claim of Ukrainian businessman Igor Kolomoisky and Belbek Airport company against the Russian Federation. Russia also refused to recognize the court jurisdiction in that case.