IBU Executive Board finds no grouns to suspend Russia's biathlon teamSport January 21, 22:53
Russia terrified watching monuments destroyed in Palmyra — culture ministerRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 21, 17:08
Russian bombers deliver successfully strikes on terrorists' facilities in SyriaWorld January 21, 15:39
Denmark uses Russian data in its application for expanding shelf — ministerBusiness & Economy January 21, 15:15
Agreement on bases in Syria to serve strengthening of stability in Middle East — MPRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 21:18
Trump's inaugural address: When America is united, America is totally unstoppableWorld January 20, 20:57
Hermitage chief: New Palmyra destruction comes across as militants' vengeanceRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 20:29
Russia's first deputy PM wants to keep current tax system for next political cycleBusiness & Economy January 20, 19:53
Russia’s Shipulin clinches gold in 20km individual race of IBU World Cup stage in ItalySport January 20, 19:18
THE HAGUE, January 11. /TASS/. Ukrainian oil producer Ukrnafta and 11 other Ukrainian companies applied to international arbitration with claims against Russia. This is evidenced by documents posted on Monday on the website of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague.
Proceedings were initiated in connection with the Russian-Ukrainian agreement on incentivization and mutual protection of investments dd. November 27, 1998. No specific information was indicated regarding claims of Ukrainian companies.
The Russian side did not recognize the jurisdiction of the international arbitration and did not appoint its representatives for the proceedings.
Further to Ukrnafta, Ukraine’s Stabil, Rubenor, Rustel, Novel-Estate, Kirovograd-Nafta, Crimea-Petrol, Pirsan, Trade-Trust, Elefteria, Satek and Stemv Group also applied to arbitration.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague said on January 6 that the arbitration started trying the claim of Ukrainian businessman Igor Kolomoisky and Belbek Airport company against the Russian Federation. Russia also refused to recognize the court jurisdiction in that case.