Putin praises Moscow International Film FestivalSociety & Culture June 22, 21:49
Russian football team getting ready for game with MexicoSport June 22, 21:38
EU agrees to extend sanctions against RussiaWorld June 22, 21:25
Lavrov tells Tillerson attempts to exert pressure on Russia through sanctions pointlessRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 22, 20:14
Russian war memorial in Poland reopens after renovationWorld June 22, 19:41
Le Bourget air show: Russia clinches contracts for military hardware deliveriesMilitary & Defense June 22, 19:28
Czech president supports idea of referendum on country’s withdrawal from EUWorld June 22, 18:57
Russian fans show fascinating hospitality at 2017 Confederations Cup — renowned pianistSport June 22, 18:32
First days of Soviet Union's Great Patriotic War in picturesSociety & Culture June 22, 18:10
MOSCOW, February 11 /TASS/. The Contact Group for Ukraine settlement has made some positive shifts at the ongoing negotiations in Minsk, Denis Pushilin, negotiator for the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), said in an interview aired live by the Rossiya-24 TV news channel on Wednesday.
"It would be too early to speak about any results. There’s progress but it remains to be seen if the result is going to be achieved," Pushilin said.
Commenting on Ukrainian press reports about the content of a draft agreement which the DPR and LPR representatives had allegedly prepared and handed over to Kiev the day before, Pushilin said that "such a document had previously existed but only in the form of recommendations by experts who collected the wishes of all the sides (in the settlement process)."
"They include the wishes of the Ukrainian side; the "Normandy four" and the militias," Pushilin said adding the sides had not used those recommendations as the basis for Wednesday discussions.
Asked what he thought about the disengagement line from where the troops could be pulled back, Pushilin said that one should not get as far ahead.
"it was noted that a demilitarized zone should be expanded. It means that heavy weapons should be pulled back at a greater distance," Pushilin explained adding that it was a compromise decision. "The disengagement line has suited neither of the sides so far.
"The proposal was made as a compromise solution," Pushilin stressed.