US-led coalition denies charges of US units leading Syrian 'opposition' through IS linesWorld September 25, 18:49
Supplies of S-400 systems to Turkey may begin within two yearsMilitary & Defense September 25, 18:14
Ukraine involved in illegal arms deliveries to South Sudan — Amnesty InternationalWorld September 25, 18:01
Russian general's death in Syria result of US double-dealing in war on terror — diplomatRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 25, 17:42
Russia's top diplomat says conditions in Syria ripe for defeating terroristsRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 25, 17:07
Russian envoy notes US actions in Syria as Washington's true colors on anti-terror policyRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 25, 17:00
Economy minister believes new technologies will drive Russia’s economyBusiness & Economy September 25, 16:50
Russian, German scientists boost gas sensor accuracy that can be used in detecting cancerScience & Space September 25, 16:45
US may try to sponsor protests ahead of presidential election in Russia, diplomat warnsRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 25, 16:36
LONDON, December 6. /TASS/. The UK’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) has ruled that the mass surveillance via programs run by US and British intelligence agencies and exposed by Edward Snowden did not breach human rights.
The tribunal made the ruling on Friday in a case that rights groups Liberty, Amnesty International and Privacy International brought against the UK government. They argued that the methods breached article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the right to privacy, and also article 10, which protects freedom of expression.
In a judgment, the panel said: "We have been able to satisfy ourselves that as of today there is no contravention of articles 8 and 10 by reference to those systems. We have left open for further argument the question as to whether prior hereto there has been a breach."
"Technology in the surveillance field appears to be advancing at breakneck speed,” the judgment reads. "All this inevitably creates considerable tension between the competing interests and the Snowden revelations in particular have led to the impression voiced in some quarters that the law permits the intelligence services carte blanche to do what they will. We are satisfied that this is not the case," it says.
Rachel Logan, Amnesty International UK’s legal advisor, said: “The government has managed to bluff their way out of this, retreating into closed hearings, and constantly playing the ‘national security’ card. The tribunal has accepted that approach.”
“We will now appeal to Strasbourg, who might not be as inclined to put their trust in the UK government given what we know so far,” said Logan.
In June 2013, Snowden leaked information on the US National Security Agency’s (NSA) secret surveillance programs conducted around the world. The whistleblower, who was charged with espionage, theft and conversion of government property in the US, has been granted temporary asylum in Russia. The asylum period was extended for three more years this August.