Russia to decide on conceptual design of future soldier’s combat gear by year-endMilitary & Defense August 23, 13:09
Press review: Netanyahu in Russia to focus on Iran and NSA spies on Russian net usersPress Review August 23, 13:00
Netanyahu calls strengthening Iran’s positions in Syria a threat to entire worldWorld August 23, 12:52
Russia to use principally new solutions in 5th-generation submarine constructionMilitary & Defense August 23, 12:46
Russia’s ‘soldier of future’ combat gear proves its worth in SyriaMilitary & Defense August 23, 12:33
Monitoring center for southern Syrian de-escalation zone starts activities in AmmanWorld August 23, 12:03
Two frigates of 11356 project to be finalized for Indian NavyMilitary & Defense August 23, 12:00
Ratnik combat gear enters service, delivery to army beginsMilitary & Defense August 23, 11:16
Russian film director says Anna Karenina: Vronsky’s Story will contend for OscarSociety & Culture August 23, 10:36
NEW YORK, November 22. /TASS/. Board Chairman of the German television ARD Paul Siebertz said that the channel had not been quite unbiased in broadcasting Ukraine’s crisis in recent months and focused on criticising Russia, the U.S. newspaper Wall Street Journal wrote on Saturday.
The ARD channel has received lots of complaints from viewers who expressed their outrage with the channel’s position in highlighting Ukraine’s crisis and “anti-Russian tendencies” in its reports.
Siebertz said that the board had decided to analyze ARD programming “after a flood of complaints.” He said he “had not seen this in his seven years on board.”
“The conclusion, according to leaked excerpts of board minutes: Some news reports failed to consider the role of the West in causing the crisis, while the format of some shows indicated “anti-Russian tendencies” and focused too much on “the personality of Putin,” the Wall Street Journal writes.
Siebertz said “the leaked excerpts represented just part of the board’s conclusions, but that he stood by them.”
“Of course it is right to criticize Russia, but one must also provide comprehensive reporting,” he said. “Many people see these political developments with great concern, and so it is very important to thoroughly debate the policies of our country.”
At the same time, Thomas Baumann disagreed with the board’s conclusions.
“I can’t see any indications that our coverage is hostile to Putin or hostile to Russia,” Baumann told the paper. “That is neither the intent nor is there evidence for this.