IBU Executive Board finds no grouns to suspend Russia's biathlon teamSport January 21, 22:53
Russia terrified watching monuments destroyed in Palmyra — culture ministerRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 21, 17:08
Russian bombers deliver successfully strikes on terrorists' facilities in SyriaWorld January 21, 15:39
Denmark uses Russian data in its application for expanding shelf — ministerBusiness & Economy January 21, 15:15
Agreement on bases in Syria to serve strengthening of stability in Middle East — MPRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 21:18
Trump's inaugural address: When America is united, America is totally unstoppableWorld January 20, 20:57
Hermitage chief: New Palmyra destruction comes across as militants' vengeanceRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 20:29
Russia's first deputy PM wants to keep current tax system for next political cycleBusiness & Economy January 20, 19:53
Russia’s Shipulin clinches gold in 20km individual race of IBU World Cup stage in ItalySport January 20, 19:18
NEW YORK, November 22. /TASS/. Board Chairman of the German television ARD Paul Siebertz said that the channel had not been quite unbiased in broadcasting Ukraine’s crisis in recent months and focused on criticising Russia, the U.S. newspaper Wall Street Journal wrote on Saturday.
The ARD channel has received lots of complaints from viewers who expressed their outrage with the channel’s position in highlighting Ukraine’s crisis and “anti-Russian tendencies” in its reports.
Siebertz said that the board had decided to analyze ARD programming “after a flood of complaints.” He said he “had not seen this in his seven years on board.”
“The conclusion, according to leaked excerpts of board minutes: Some news reports failed to consider the role of the West in causing the crisis, while the format of some shows indicated “anti-Russian tendencies” and focused too much on “the personality of Putin,” the Wall Street Journal writes.
Siebertz said “the leaked excerpts represented just part of the board’s conclusions, but that he stood by them.”
“Of course it is right to criticize Russia, but one must also provide comprehensive reporting,” he said. “Many people see these political developments with great concern, and so it is very important to thoroughly debate the policies of our country.”
At the same time, Thomas Baumann disagreed with the board’s conclusions.
“I can’t see any indications that our coverage is hostile to Putin or hostile to Russia,” Baumann told the paper. “That is neither the intent nor is there evidence for this.