Agreement on bases in Syria to serve strengthening of stability in Middle East — MPRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 21:18
Trump's inaugural address: When America is united, America is totally unstoppableWorld January 20, 20:57
Hermitage chief: New Palmyra destruction comes across as militants' vengeanceRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 20:29
Russia's first deputy PM wants to keep current tax system for next political cycleBusiness & Economy January 20, 19:53
Russia’s Shipulin clinches gold in 20km individual race of IBU World Cup stage in ItalySport January 20, 19:18
Prominent Russian adventurer Konyukhov to take samples from Mariana Trench floorSociety & Culture January 20, 19:15
Gazprom CEO says North Stream-2 pipeline proves relevanceBusiness & Economy January 20, 19:10
More survivors found in avalanche-hit Italian hotel — mediaWorld January 20, 18:48
Donald Trump takes office as 45th US PresidentWorld January 20, 18:21
"Theoretically, it is possible "on a bilateral basis" without asking the consent of the other NATO member states. But in that case it would have been "casus belli"(a Latin expression meaning "an act or event that provokes or is used to justify war") or a direct challenge to Russia," the MP said. Therefore, the United States is unlikely to agree to have its bases there, Pushkov said.
"Since Russia poses no threat to the United States, bringing the US infrastructure close to Russia would deal a colossal blow to long-term relations between Russia and the United States," Pushkov explained. The Obama administration is not likely to do that, he added.