Twelve terror acts prevented in Russia in first half of yearSociety & Culture July 27, 12:05
Russian ultra-high frequency guns are real, developer saysMilitary & Defense July 27, 11:32
German industrialists oppose politicizing Nord Stream-2 projectBusiness & Economy July 27, 10:36
Putin signs law on ratification of Russia air force grouping in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 27, 9:49
Moscow clarifies its stance on new anti-Russian sanctions to BrusselsRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 27, 9:35
Russia’s Defense Ministry launches Chinese and Arabic versions of 2017 Army Games websiteMilitary & Defense July 27, 8:55
Japanese commander’s residence believed to be found by Russian expedition on Matua islandSociety & Culture July 27, 8:47
Finland succeeds in building prosperous state for 100 years of independence — presidentWorld July 27, 8:27
Russian expedition recovers unique naval gun from Kerch StraitSociety & Culture July 27, 8:18
MOSCOW, June 05. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia’s MP considers the G7 countries’ approach towards the presidential elections in Syria the policy of double standards.
“The elections in Syria and Ukraine were held amid armed actions. It is cynical to compare the number of casualties,” Russia’s Federation Council Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Mikhail Margelov told ITAR-TASS on Thursday.
“By having expelled Russia, the G7 turned into a real mutual admiration society under the moral of the famous fable, ‘claw me, and I will claw thee’. They did not recognize the results of Syria’s presidential elections unanimously. But they consider the elections in Ukraine legitimate,” he said.
However, Margelov said, “The people’s will, expressed in their ballots, is worthy of respect.”
“The presidential elections in Syria are much more democratic than the extension of President Bashar Assad’s term. There are no reasons for him to resign,” he said.
He believes that “the policy of double standards is ordinary practice for the West and its foreign policy stance. It cannot be the other. They believe that only they can draw ‘correct’ borders between states and have right views on ‘good’ and ‘evil’. And they are indignant when they are shown it is wrong”.