Russian meteorology service reports 2016 is record warm year in ArcticBusiness & Economy January 24, 18:22
Russian chief negotiator comments on outcome of Syria peace talks in AstanaRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 24, 18:11
Legendary Isinbayeva blasts recent German film on alleged doping in Russian athleticsSport January 24, 18:07
Russian senator says Astana meeting on settling Syrian crisis proves successfulRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 24, 17:55
Russian State Duma speaker hopes PACE will confirm its pan-European status under AgramuntRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 24, 17:14
De Mistura says agreement on Syria ceasefire monitoring major result of Astana talksWorld January 24, 17:07
Damascus won’t accept unilateral decisions on Syria’s federalization — envoyWorld January 24, 16:46
Syrian opposition hopes UNSC will pass resolution based on its proposalsWorld January 24, 16:28
Russian bombers destroy Islamic State's arms depots in Deir ez-ZorMilitary & Defense January 24, 16:22
MOSCOW, June 05. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia’s MP considers the G7 countries’ approach towards the presidential elections in Syria the policy of double standards.
“The elections in Syria and Ukraine were held amid armed actions. It is cynical to compare the number of casualties,” Russia’s Federation Council Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Mikhail Margelov told ITAR-TASS on Thursday.
“By having expelled Russia, the G7 turned into a real mutual admiration society under the moral of the famous fable, ‘claw me, and I will claw thee’. They did not recognize the results of Syria’s presidential elections unanimously. But they consider the elections in Ukraine legitimate,” he said.
However, Margelov said, “The people’s will, expressed in their ballots, is worthy of respect.”
“The presidential elections in Syria are much more democratic than the extension of President Bashar Assad’s term. There are no reasons for him to resign,” he said.
He believes that “the policy of double standards is ordinary practice for the West and its foreign policy stance. It cannot be the other. They believe that only they can draw ‘correct’ borders between states and have right views on ‘good’ and ‘evil’. And they are indignant when they are shown it is wrong”.