Scientists discover three Earth-sized exoplanets that may potentially harbor lifeScience & Space February 23, 5:50
Syrian opposition ready for direct talks with government delegation — representativeWorld February 22, 21:56
UN Syria envoy expects no breakthrough at new round of Syria talksWorld February 22, 21:09
Russia opposes sharing responsibility for fate of Middle East refugeesRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 22, 20:36
First woman in space Valentina Tereshkova may meet with Queen Elizabeth IIRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 22, 20:27
Spain’s famous footballer Puyol returns to Russia next week ahead of FIFA 2017, 2018 CupsSport February 22, 20:15
Putin promotes generals to higher military ranks after Syria operationMilitary & Defense February 22, 19:56
Russia, Turkey may discuss purchase of S-400 systems at March talksMilitary & Defense February 22, 19:18
European human rights watchdog welcomes court’s ruling on Russian opposition activistWorld February 22, 18:42
“I don’t even look at this scenario and don’t concede it, since from the very beginning Russia’s position has been clear and transparent - actual ways out of this political crisis can be found only in a nationwide dialogue in Ukraine,” she told journalists on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. Russia, in her words, had been calling for such dialogue.
She explained why back at the very beginning of the Ukrainian crisis the Federation Council had allowed the Russian president to use the army in Ukraine. It had been necessary to grant the president the entire toolkit for taking emergency decisions in case the situation developed under the worst scenario, she said. The upper house “gave its consent to cool down hotheads so that they understood that it is inadmissible to infringe upon people’s rights, to put in jeopardy people’s security,” she stressed. According to Matviyenko, this consent was a kind of warning for those who was about to launch a blood-shedding scenario in Ukraine.