Ministry reports US spy agencies' latest attempt to recruit Russian worker was on Jan 14Russian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 21:57
Austria’s president-elect says he is ready to maintain good relations with RussiaWorld January 18, 21:50
Putin briefs Merkel, Hollande on steps to implement Syrian ceasefireRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 20:39
Putin, Merkel, Hollande agree to give fresh impetus to Normandy Four activitiesRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 20:26
Russian Eurobonds may be floated in spring 2017 — finance ministerBusiness & Economy January 18, 19:48
Russia, Turkey report 14 ceasefire breaches in Syria per dayWorld January 18, 19:17
Analyst believes removal of sanctions can be political bargaining chip with RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 18:45
Arctic Forum’s task is to change perception of region as source of raw material — officialBusiness & Economy January 18, 18:28
OPEC revises Russia’s oil production outlook downward by 110,000 bpd in 2017Business & Economy January 18, 18:20
In his opinion, “either American government officials are unaware of the real state of economic cooperation between the US and Russia or they have the overly complete picture of such cooperation and intentionally choose the measures that cannot affect real transactions”.
“Today we have seen a new portion of ‘cosmetic sanctions’ on the part of the American leadership. The only major contract between the US Department of Energy and Rosatom – HEU-LEU agreement – ended in 2013, while Rosatom’s current interests in the United States are determined by separate transactions with private companies, which have no relation to the American regulator,” the expert said.
Ignatyuk believes that if a new portion of sanction were directed against real contracts, the US government would not impose them for they would have too negative an impact on the American economy itself. “Aggressive American politicians have got enough sense not to leave half of the American nuclear power plants without fuel,” he added.
Rosatom said “all joint obligations under commercial contracts between Russian and American enterprises are implemented in full”.
Under the agreement the two countries were supposed to join efforts in developing new nuclear power technologies, ensuring safe handling of nuclear waste and non-energy use of nuclear technologies, including for medical purposes.
Rosatom said it considered the US decision “an erroneous step that runs counter to the constructive spirit [in relations] with the US Energy Department in recent years”.
“Nuclear power is a very subtle and serious matter. It requires a responsible and professional approach from all members of the international community. Politicisation is not appropriate here,” Rosatom said.
It stressed that “any attempt to bring unilateral restrictions into this area will affect those who initiate such steps in the first place”.