Experts to search for lost Progress spacecraft’s fragments in SiberiaScience & Space December 06, 23:57
Russian opera prima donna nominated for Grammy 2017 awardSociety & Culture December 06, 23:46
Russian pediatrician wounded in Aleppo flown to MoscowWorld December 06, 23:35
Putin looks forward to overcoming negative trends in turnover with TurkeyBusiness & Economy December 06, 21:20
Red Cross to continue humanitarian operations in Aleppo — spokespersonWorld December 06, 21:09
Russia proposes UN to be venue for discussing world’s controversial anti-doping systemSport December 06, 21:04
Dialogue on Germany’s initiative for armed control depends on NATO — diplomatRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 06, 20:57
Mikhail Saakashvili says he seeks to change Ukraine’s political classWorld December 06, 20:46
Defense minister promises 2017 World Military Games in Sochi to be held 'at highest level'Military & Defense December 06, 20:37
In his opinion, “either American government officials are unaware of the real state of economic cooperation between the US and Russia or they have the overly complete picture of such cooperation and intentionally choose the measures that cannot affect real transactions”.
“Today we have seen a new portion of ‘cosmetic sanctions’ on the part of the American leadership. The only major contract between the US Department of Energy and Rosatom – HEU-LEU agreement – ended in 2013, while Rosatom’s current interests in the United States are determined by separate transactions with private companies, which have no relation to the American regulator,” the expert said.
Ignatyuk believes that if a new portion of sanction were directed against real contracts, the US government would not impose them for they would have too negative an impact on the American economy itself. “Aggressive American politicians have got enough sense not to leave half of the American nuclear power plants without fuel,” he added.
Rosatom said “all joint obligations under commercial contracts between Russian and American enterprises are implemented in full”.
Under the agreement the two countries were supposed to join efforts in developing new nuclear power technologies, ensuring safe handling of nuclear waste and non-energy use of nuclear technologies, including for medical purposes.
Rosatom said it considered the US decision “an erroneous step that runs counter to the constructive spirit [in relations] with the US Energy Department in recent years”.
“Nuclear power is a very subtle and serious matter. It requires a responsible and professional approach from all members of the international community. Politicisation is not appropriate here,” Rosatom said.
It stressed that “any attempt to bring unilateral restrictions into this area will affect those who initiate such steps in the first place”.