Islamic State attack on Iraq's Kirkuk rebuffedWorld October 21, 15:48
Romano Prodi says Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline is not in Italy’s interestBusiness & Economy October 21, 15:38
Russian women's futsal team 'didn't have to wear hijabs, but chose to' — coachSport October 21, 15:35
Moscow says Belgian defense minister tries to distract attention from Hassadjek attackRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 21, 15:04
Russian suspected of alleged cyberattacks on US to remain in custody — Czech ministryWorld October 21, 14:55
Justice Ministry rejects Ukraine’s extradition bid for filmmaker convicted in terror plotRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 21, 14:52
Kremlin says EU sanctions policy against Russia destructiveRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 21, 14:48
NATO to use AWACS aircraft for Syrian airspace surveillance soonWorld October 21, 14:40
Switzerland seeks to bolster ties with Russia — senior lawmakerRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 21, 14:26
BRUSSELS, March 29, /ITAR-TASS/. If Europe opts for alternatives to Russian gas it should be prepared to pay twice as much, as follows from a just-published survey by Bruegel, a research group in Brussels.
At present about 40 percent of the European gas import comes from Russia. The EU pays about 53 billion dollars a year, Bruegel said. The world gas prices as they are, Europe can hope to attract overseas liquefied natural gas only it is prepared for a 100-percent price hike. Also, one should add the extra costs of building LNG terminals.
If Russian gas were to be replaced with a package of energy resources including Norwegian gas, LNG from the United States and Europe-mined coal, the likely price growth would be not so great, but still significant - 50 percent, Bruegel says.
Also, this solution implying the re-activation of Europe’s coal-fuelled power generation would ruin the EU’s ecological ambitions to cut greenhouse gas emissions, for coal is the dirtiest of the fossil fuels.