EU ambassadors agree sanctions against Russia over Siemens turbines rowBusiness & Economy July 26, 15:11
London court binds Ukraine to pay par value of Eurobonds to RussiaBusiness & Economy July 26, 15:05
A glimpse of rare species in Moscow zoo breeding centerSociety & Culture July 26, 14:53
EC announces readiness to defend European interests against US sanctionsBusiness & Economy July 26, 14:24
Official says it's up to Turkey as NATO member to decide on purchase of Russian S-400World July 26, 14:09
Russian Navy gets 60 Kalibr missiles over three monthsMilitary & Defense July 26, 13:57
Russians fined about $1mln this year for smoking ban violationsSociety & Culture July 26, 13:57
Kiev court orders security service to launch probe against Poroshenko for high treasonWorld July 26, 13:54
Press review: Senate puts envoy to Moscow on hold and Erdogan trumpets S-400 dealPress Review July 26, 13:00
NEW YORK, September 12 (Itar-Tass) - There are strong reasons to state that not official Damascus, but the opposition forces are behind the use of chemical weapons in Syria, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in an article published by The New York Times on Wednesday.
“No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria,” Putin noted. “But there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists.” In this connection, Putin writes, “reports that militants are preparing another attack — this time against Israel — cannot be ignored.”
“From the outset, Russia has advocated peaceful dialogue enabling Syrians to develop a compromise plan for their own future,” the Russian leader stated. “We are not protecting the Syrian government, but international law. We need to use the United Nations Security Council and believe that preserving law and order in today’s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep international relations from sliding into chaos. The law is still the law, and we must follow it whether we like it or not,” he stressed. “Under current international law, force is permitted only in self-defence or by the decision of the Security Council. Anything else is unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an act of aggression.”
“It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States,” Russian president added. “Is it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan “you’re either with us or against us,” Putin emphasised.
Meanwhile, Putin’s article has sparked interest among Americans, local media reported. For example, New York Public Radio note that Russia’s president chose the perfect time to appeal to Americans, using the short period of U.S.-Russia relations when American citizens share Putin’s point of view – they don’t want their country to fight in Syria. A number of American political scientists highlighted that Russia is successful at influencing global politics, as demonstrated by the Syrian crisis resolution.