Putin says experience gained in Syria to be discussed at Defense Ministry board meetingMilitary & Defense December 07, 17:49
Luxembourg Forum to convene conference on nuclear security in 2017World December 07, 17:32
Pole vault star Isinbayeva takes charge of Russian Anti-Doping Agency’s supervisory boardSport December 07, 17:28
Russian expert says North Korea has effective means of delivering nuclear weaponsWorld December 07, 17:23
Russian rapper must shell out $781 to fellow performer for 'mop-haired creep' tweetSociety & Culture December 07, 16:49
Senator says Aleppo may be fully liberated by end of 2016World December 07, 16:36
Donald Trump named Time magazine’s Person of the YearWorld December 07, 16:05
Irish court unlocks 100 mln euros on Khodorkovsky’s accountsBusiness & Economy December 07, 15:53
Syrian troops recapture ten quarters of Aleppo — Russian Defense MinistryWorld December 07, 15:45
MOSCOW, August 8. /TASS/. Filing an appeal at the federal court in Lausanne was just the first step in what is going to prove long struggle against discrimination, the 2015 world champion in men’s 110 m hurdles, Sergey Shubenkov, has told TASS.
Spokesman for the Swiss Federal Court in Lausanne Peter Josi earlier informed TASS that Isinbayeva and Russian track and field athlete Sergey Shubenkov had appealed the ban verdict of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) disqualifying them from competing in the Rio Olympics.
"Of course, there is no hope for participating in the Olympics any more. It’s rather a quest for justice," he said. "It is very wrong an athlete like me, who has never violated anything, is not taking part in the Olympics Games. This is not the way it should be. Filing a protest was just the first step in what may prove a long quest for justice and struggle against discrimination, in which I will seek moral compensation. I have a degree in law and I am aware of some legal nuances," he added.
"We decided to spare time, not to wait for the end of the Games and act now - this a logical step to appeal the CAS verdict from July 21. We cannot agree with the (CAS) verdict. What do you think of this: the court returns the verdict (not in favor of the plaintiff), then the secretary general comes out with a press release and says that the plaintiff’s arguments were in fact fair. What can we do after this if not to appeal this decision?" Shubenkov noted.