Russia's UN envoy urges organization to prove Aleppo air strikes continueRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 27, 8:02
Media reports on Russian ships call into Ceuta are controversial — embassyRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 26, 22:03
Russia’s telecom watchdog tries to block LinkedIn through courtSociety & Culture October 26, 21:29
DPR envoy reports no constructive discussion on "Steinmeier formula" in MinskWorld October 26, 21:14
Six NATO countries say ready to dispatch their forces to Black Sea areaWorld October 26, 20:43
Moscow refutes allegations about plans for Russian cruiser's call into Spanish portMilitary & Defense October 26, 20:38
US, Israel abstain from UN GA vote condemning Cuba embargoWorld October 26, 20:31
Western sanctions expected to relax gradually in 2017 — ex-finance ministerBusiness & Economy October 26, 20:25
Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates intend to see battle for world’s chess crown — FIDE chiefSport October 26, 20:24
MOSCOW, July 12. /TASS/. Moscow’s Savyolovsky District Court has rejected the anti-defamation lawsuit filed by blogger Alexei Navalny against Russia’s VGTRK TV and radio company, its Deputy Director General Dmitry Kiselyov and reporter Yevgeny Popov.
"To reject the lawsuit fully," the judge ruled. The reason for the lawsuit was the announcement of the Browder Effect documentary shown in the Vesti Nedeli (News of the Week) program on Rossiya 1 TV channel on April 10, 2016. The program is hosted by Dmitry Kiselyov and Yevgeny Popov is the author of the documentary, which said that Navalny’s activities are allegedly financed by the UK intelligence services and featured documents and letters proving his possible links to head of Hermitage Capital Management William Browder.
Navalny asked to publish a retraction saying that the information given in the documentary was not true, including regarding his negotiations with former State Duma member Ilya Ponomaryov. The representative of the VGTRK media holding asked the court to reject the lawsuit. "The plaintiff did not confirm that the information is defamatory. I ask to reject his claim," she said.
The court also attached to the case a reply of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) to Navalny’s inquiry that no criminal case for high treason has been initiated against him. Navalny earlier got in touch with the FSB asking it to verify the information featured in the documentary.
The plaintiff said after the hearing that he expected this ruling. "Of course, we will appeal it," Navalny said.