Anti-church laws in Ukraine may cause religious strife — Ukrainian Orthodox ChurchWorld May 28, 0:22
Russia’s national football team absolutely clear of doping — doctorSport May 28, 0:14
Russian cyclist Zakarin finishes second in Giro d’Italia Stage 20Sport May 27, 22:27
Putin, Erdogan agree to develop coordination of efforts for settlement in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 27, 19:29
Putin, Rouhani stress importance of joint efforts in settlement of Syrian conflictRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 27, 14:32
Federatsiya spacecraft’s first flight may be rescheduled to 2022 - sourceScience & Space May 27, 14:29
Zbigniew Brzezinski dies at age of 89World May 27, 6:57
More than two-thirds of Russians say would like to venerate St Nicholas’s relicsSociety & Culture May 27, 6:40
Russian space budget may grow this yearScience & Space May 26, 20:48
MOSCOW, July 12. /TASS/. Moscow City’s Savyolovsky district court is expected to consider on merits a defamation lawsuit the oppositionist blogger Alexei Navalny filed against the Deputy Director General of the state broadcasting company VGTRK, Dmitry Kiselyov, and reporter Yevgeny Popov.
The court postponed the hearings earlier at Popov’s request so that the latter man could sign an agreement with a lawyer.
Navalny filed the lawsuit in connection with a preview of the documentary ‘The Browder Effect’, which Rossiya One channel aired on April 10 during the News of the Week prime time show.
Yevgeny Popov is the author of the film, which claimed Navalny was drawing finance from the British intelligence services. Dmitry Kiselyov is the host of the highly popular analysis show.
Also, the documentary cited the documents and correspondence testifying to a possibility of a connection between Navalny and the highly controversial international investor, William Browder, the head of the Hermitage Capital foundation.
Navalny described the data as standing at variance with reality and marring his dignity and business reputation. The lawsuit does not contain any financial claims but the claimant did not rule out their possibility in the future.