Lavrov: Russia’s Aerospace Force maintains security of Russian personnel in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 25, 14:07
China's Huawei to invest $3 mln in joint projects with Russia in 2017Business & Economy April 25, 13:33
Mongolia asks Russia to arm its air defense forcesMilitary & Defense April 25, 13:19
Serbian military wants to take part in demining PalmyraWorld April 25, 13:06
Press review: Trump turns up heat on Iran nukes and US seeks to restore safe Syrian skiesPress Review April 25, 13:00
New GLONASS satellites will be transmitting encoded signalScience & Space April 25, 12:56
Russia calls for unbiased investigation into incident with OSCE mission in DonbassRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 25, 12:52
Russia, Serbia to boost military cooperationMilitary & Defense April 25, 12:36
Russia, Qatar eyeing joint projects worth $12 blnBusiness & Economy April 25, 11:58
MOSCOW, January 10. /ITAR-TASS World Service/. The economic slump of 2013 was not a surprise for Russia, former Minister of Economics and current scientific expert of the Higher School of Economics Yevgeny Yasin wrote in his article published by Rossiiskaya Gazeta. “Many people would call 2013 a year of missed opportunities. This is not true. There were no opportunities! Thus, there was nothing to miss.”
“For quite a time, from 2003 through to 2008, the high economic growth was based on the quick growth of oil prices. To a big extent, we have exhausted those opportunities, which were on the surface. However, we did not use more important factors, which require reformation of institutions, bigger business activities, protection of property rights and improvement of businesses’ trust to the state and the society’s trust to businesses,” Yasin wrote.
In his opinion, the economic growth of 1.5-2% will remain in 2014. “No doubt, we require higher rates, which, in fact, are realistic — annual growth of four percent over five-six years.”
“If we managed to have the growth of the rate, it would mean the country is developing ahead of main partners and competitors (their economies would not grow by more than two percent),” the economist said. This scenario could mean our modernization is in progress, we are catching up, and we have a chance to be among the league of developed countries, the league of the successful ones. Or the super league. However, if we have only two percent, like what they have, this would mean we are not catching up. And even though the international situation may be favorable, the modernization would not progress.
Our economy should be innovative, and there you may be trading a big number of innovations. This is what we have almost always failed, despite of some successful stories in the space development, or nuclear construction. But those are, so to say, not peaceful products, and to a big extent those have been parts of the defense industry. Now we are facing different objectives. They are typical for the new stage of Russia’s development as a country of market economics.
Itar-Tass is not responsible for the material quoted in these press reviews