Eighty years since assembly of legendary Soviet monument at 1937 World’s Fair in ParisSociety & Culture May 25, 8:15
Putin receives message clarifying intentions of new South Korean presidentRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 25, 7:47
Forest fires raging on over 8,000 hectares in Russia’s Far East and SiberiaWorld May 25, 6:44
Ukraine’s Savchenko says wants to run for president in 2019World May 25, 3:38
Putin venerates St Nicholas's relics in Cathedral of the SaviorSociety & Culture May 24, 21:53
Putin points out Russia’s good relations with EgyptRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 24, 21:30
Ukraine names conditions for Minsk accords' political part implementationWorld May 24, 20:44
Blaze-stricken Siberian areas expecting downpours that may quash firesSociety & Culture May 24, 19:45
Contact Group on Ukraine proposes more areas of disengagementWorld May 24, 19:39
MOSCOW, August 2 (Itar-Tass) — The Zamoskvorechye and Khamovniki courts of Moscow which are reviewing the cases against Rasul Mirzayev and Pussy Riots punk group activists banned reporters on Tuesday from citing witnesses. The courts ruled that only indirect speech might be published. Independent experts, bewildered by the decision, have criticized it.
The Rossiiskaya Gazeta reports that at first, Khamovniki court judge Marina Syrova had banned not only online broadcast, photographing and videoing, but also citing witnesses by journalists. Later, Zamoskvorechye court spokeswoman Yevgeniya Pazukhina asked the journalists not to cite the testimony of witnesses in the criminal case against Rasul Mirzayev. "Word-for-word citing of witnesses' testimony is prohibited by the Criminal Procedure Code; we ask to cite their testimony as indirect speech," the spokeswoman said. The measures are applied with the purpose to guarantee the parties' competitiveness.
"Such advice by press secretaries has no practical significance. There is only one thing that is important - the courts are trying to press the mass media and restrict the coverage of trials. They would hold all trials in camera if legislation did not prohibit it," head of the Moscow Public Observer Commission Valery Borshchev told the Nezavisimaya Gazeta. He also underlined that with the modern means of communications, such as notebooks, i-Pads and mobile phones - there is always an opportunity to relay information about the trial. "If someone tries to search a visitor at the entrance to the court, and seize the equipment permitted at open trials, it will be additional evidence of reprisals against the mass media. But even this will avail them nothing, because journalists will be able to write it down and will publish trial data at the first opportunity," he noted.
Moscow Bar president Genry Reznik told the Novye Izvestia that a judge has no right to dictate to the journalists how they should bring information to their audience. The lawyer sees no fundamental difference between direct quoting and conscientious rendering. Retired police Colonel, lawyer Yevgeny Chernousov also stated that he saw no logic in the ban. "It is not important what witnesses read about the testimony of other witnesses in the newspaper," Chernousov said.