War on terror to dominate Geneva talks — Syrian UN envoyWorld February 25, 23:48
Russian skier wins gold in skiathlon at 2017 FIS Nordic World Ski ChampionshipsSport February 25, 17:46
Top US Air Force general points to growing conflict potential in Syrian airspaceWorld February 25, 17:17
Iran relies on Russia’s support in production of fuel for nuclear power plantsBusiness & Economy February 25, 16:20
Ukrainian military capture Donetsk water purification plant — spokesmanWorld February 25, 15:05
Azerbaijan and Armenia report armed clashes in Karabakh conflict areaWorld February 25, 11:45
Head of Russian delegation to OSCE PA says Ukraine not ready for dialogueRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 25, 5:02
Russian baritone Hvorostovsky cancels concerts due to continuing treatmentSociety & Culture February 25, 3:22
Russian prime minister declares 3rd Winter World Military Games openMilitary & Defense February 24, 22:33
MOSCOW, September 13 (Itar-Tass) — The institute of RF president’s plenipotentiary representatives in federal districts may be abolished, writes Novye Izvestiya. The article was written in connection with a recent rotation that Dmitry Medvedev made among the envoys: the officials have been replaced in three federal districts – the Central, Ural and North-West.
The reshuffles can hardly be taken out of the pre-election context, the publication believes. “The election rotation has started, and on the positions of the envoys that traditionally control the electoral process, people who can technologically do it have been placed,” the newspaper quoted Director General of the Political Information Centre Alexei Mukhin.
In 2000, when the post of plenipotentiary representative was just introduced, there was much talk that new federal officials with super powers and a huge zone of influence would appear in Russia, but this has not happened. “Because from the very beginning the envoys had no constitutional powers, and they were perceived as members of the presidential administration, who have no right to command by directive the activities of the governors whose authority is clearly laid down in the Constitution,” political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin explains the reasons for this.
Experts believe that the recent strengthening of the institute of plenipotentiary envoys made by the president is a kind of overture that precedes its weakening and possibly elimination.
“Plenipotentiaries were needed as long as the governors were elected, a control bureaucratic layer between the federal government and governors was needed. When the heads of the regions themselves are actually plenipotentiary envoys the need for this layer has disappeared,” President of the National Strategy Institute Stanislav Belkovsky says.
When electoral tasks are fulfilled, most likely there will be simply no sense in leaving the presidential representatives in the authority structure with completely loyal governors, the publication believes. Perhaps the only exception will be made for the North Caucasus Federal District owing to the nature of the situation in the region and the need to balance the influence of local elites at the heads of the republics with “the man from the centre.” Taking such a step would be very easy because the plenipotentiary envoys are not specified in the Constitution and the president has the right to decide the issue independently without coordination with the State Duma.