Agreement on bases in Syria to serve strengthening of stability in Middle East — MPRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 21:18
Trump's inaugural address: When America is united, America is totally unstoppableWorld January 20, 20:57
Hermitage chief: New Palmyra destruction comes across as militants' vengeanceRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 20:29
Russia's first deputy PM wants to keep current tax system for next political cycleBusiness & Economy January 20, 19:53
Russia’s Shipulin clinches gold in 20km individual race of IBU World Cup stage in ItalySport January 20, 19:18
Prominent Russian adventurer Konyukhov to take samples from Mariana Trench floorSociety & Culture January 20, 19:15
Gazprom CEO says North Stream-2 pipeline proves relevanceBusiness & Economy January 20, 19:10
More survivors found in avalanche-hit Italian hotel — mediaWorld January 20, 18:48
Donald Trump takes office as 45th US PresidentWorld January 20, 18:21
ST.PETERSBURG, July 14. /TASS/. Russia’s Constitutional Court ruled on Tuesday that the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) may not be implemented literally if they contradict the country’s main law.Judge Sergey Mavrin said if the ECHR judgement made upon a complaint against Russia contradicts the Constitution, then "such a ruling may not be implemented." Russia may in some cases recede from its international commitments if their interpretation violates the Constitution.
The Constitutional Court continues handing down the ruling. The document will enter into force after it is fully announced.
The high court responded to an inquiry from a group of deputies of the State Duma, the lower house of parliament, on applying the ECHR judgments in Russia.
In February 1996, Russia signed the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and a number of respective protocols. By ratifying these agreements, the country accepted the jurisdiction of the ECHR and committed itself to implement its decisions.
The respective provisions were later included in a range of laws and codes making the ECHR rulings the ground for revising the earlier announced court decisions.