Russian radio-electronic company working on artificial brain components for dronesMilitary & Defense July 27, 12:08
Twelve terror acts prevented in Russia in first half of yearSociety & Culture July 27, 12:05
Russian ultra-high frequency guns are real, developer saysMilitary & Defense July 27, 11:32
German industrialists oppose politicizing Nord Stream-2 projectBusiness & Economy July 27, 10:36
Putin signs law on ratification of Russia air force grouping in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 27, 9:49
Moscow clarifies its stance on new anti-Russian sanctions to BrusselsRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 27, 9:35
Russia’s Defense Ministry launches Chinese and Arabic versions of 2017 Army Games websiteMilitary & Defense July 27, 8:55
Japanese commander’s residence believed to be found by Russian expedition on Matua islandSociety & Culture July 27, 8:47
Finland succeeds in building prosperous state for 100 years of independence — presidentWorld July 27, 8:27
MOSCOW, July 3. /TASS/. Investigators consider former head of the Russian Nanotechnology Corporation (Rosnanotech) Leonid Melamed to be the organizer in the case of embezzlement of $5.3 million.
A pre-trial measure against the defendant is to be chosen later on Friday. The Basmanny district court of Moscow has received a petition from the Investigative Committee requesting to choose custody as a pre-trial measure for Melamed who is suspected of organizing large-scale embezzlement, the court’s press service said.
"Due to the fact that Melamed was detained in the afternoon on July 1, the investigators must take a decision on choosing a pre-trial measure for him today, as the 48-hour deadline expires," a source familiar with the situation told TASS.
Criminal proceedings were initiated in September 2013 over unfair tender process and the conclusion of an unprofitable agreement for the state corporation on rendering service with the tender’s winner , the Alemar Investment Group (co-owned by Melamed). As a result, the state corporation (named Rusnano since March 2011) sustained losses worth about $5.3 million.
The company said though that no damage had been inflicted on it because of the actions of its former head.