ECHR rules not to revise its judgement on Beslan hostage taking caseWorld September 19, 19:18
Trump vows to 'totally destroy North Korea' if threatenedWorld September 19, 17:50
Russian top brass calls on US to not hamper Damascus’ fight against terrorismMilitary & Defense September 19, 17:49
Zapad-2017 exercise puts Russian army’s "nervous system" to testMilitary & Defense September 19, 17:33
Ukrainian conflict led to spike in hate speech, Russophobia — Council of EuropeWorld September 19, 17:00
Russian regions contribute scores of natural stones for memorial to Gulag victimsSociety & Culture September 19, 16:45
Warsaw police hunting vandals who desecrated Soviet military cemeteryWorld September 19, 16:39
Donbass truce first step towards lifting anti-Russian sanctions — German top diplomatWorld September 19, 16:36
Moscow court arrests man suspected of stabbing hiker to deathSociety & Culture September 19, 16:34
MOSCOW, July 3. /TASS/. Investigators consider former head of the Russian Nanotechnology Corporation (Rosnanotech) Leonid Melamed to be the organizer in the case of embezzlement of $5.3 million.
A pre-trial measure against the defendant is to be chosen later on Friday. The Basmanny district court of Moscow has received a petition from the Investigative Committee requesting to choose custody as a pre-trial measure for Melamed who is suspected of organizing large-scale embezzlement, the court’s press service said.
"Due to the fact that Melamed was detained in the afternoon on July 1, the investigators must take a decision on choosing a pre-trial measure for him today, as the 48-hour deadline expires," a source familiar with the situation told TASS.
Criminal proceedings were initiated in September 2013 over unfair tender process and the conclusion of an unprofitable agreement for the state corporation on rendering service with the tender’s winner , the Alemar Investment Group (co-owned by Melamed). As a result, the state corporation (named Rusnano since March 2011) sustained losses worth about $5.3 million.
The company said though that no damage had been inflicted on it because of the actions of its former head.