Nobody in Moldova will take risk of recognizing Crimea as part of Russia now — presidentWorld January 17, 17:56
Putin expects Russia, US to restore normal relationsRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 17, 17:43
Police investigate reports alleging controversial artist Pavlensky beat up theater actorSociety & Culture January 17, 17:38
Arctic Skills competition presentation due at forum in ArkhangelskBusiness & Economy January 17, 17:25
Putin: Those who ordered fake Russia’s Trump dossier 'worse than prostitutes'Russian Politics & Diplomacy January 17, 17:22
VTB head expects US sanctions against Russia to be eased in 2017Business & Economy January 17, 17:05
Russia’s Khabarovsk Region to host 2018 World Bandy ChampionshipSport January 17, 16:59
Moscow wants to be informed about Moldova’s cooperation with EU — PutinRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 17, 16:54
Putin accuses outgoing US administration of attempting to undermine Trump’s legitimacyRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 17, 16:35
MOSCOW, July 3. /TASS/. Investigators consider former head of the Russian Nanotechnology Corporation (Rosnanotech) Leonid Melamed to be the organizer in the case of embezzlement of $5.3 million.
A pre-trial measure against the defendant is to be chosen later on Friday. The Basmanny district court of Moscow has received a petition from the Investigative Committee requesting to choose custody as a pre-trial measure for Melamed who is suspected of organizing large-scale embezzlement, the court’s press service said.
"Due to the fact that Melamed was detained in the afternoon on July 1, the investigators must take a decision on choosing a pre-trial measure for him today, as the 48-hour deadline expires," a source familiar with the situation told TASS.
Criminal proceedings were initiated in September 2013 over unfair tender process and the conclusion of an unprofitable agreement for the state corporation on rendering service with the tender’s winner , the Alemar Investment Group (co-owned by Melamed). As a result, the state corporation (named Rusnano since March 2011) sustained losses worth about $5.3 million.
The company said though that no damage had been inflicted on it because of the actions of its former head.