MiG-31 interceptor jet crashes in RussiaMilitary & Defense April 26, 12:41
Russian court upholds house arrest of ex-economy ministerBusiness & Economy April 26, 12:39
Putin unwilling to publicly forecast ruble dymanicsBusiness & Economy April 26, 12:30
Kremlin comments on French top diplomat’s statement on use of sarin gas in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 26, 12:21
Defense chief says NATO brings its military infrastructure closer to Russia’s ArcticRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 26, 11:52
Lavrov warns about consequences of US global missile defense system deploymentRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 26, 11:43
Top diplomat claims France has evidence proving use of sarin gas in IdlibWorld April 26, 11:34
Russia’s FSB chief says Islamic State holding talks on uniting with other terror groupsRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 26, 11:12
Russia urges Normandy Four to intensify efforts with Kiev — LavrovWorld April 26, 10:56
MOSCOW, March 20. /TASS/. The Moscow City Court has upheld the complaint of the Moscow branch of the Red Cross against the ruling of a district court in Moscow, which refused to consider the organization’s defamation suit against 18 US and Ukrainian media outlets, said lawyer Igor Trunov, who is also the chairman of the Moscow Branch of the Red Cross.
"The Moscow City Court has upheld our appeal, ordering the Savyolovsky district court to consider the complaint," he said.
The lawsuit says that the system of humanitarian aid convoys for the population of southeastern Ukraine has caused a series of slanderous and false publications in the U.S. and Ukrainian media with a view of discrediting the legitimate assistance from Russia.
Trunov noted that US and Ukrainian media had unlawfully misinterpreted the reports on the December 25 news conference regarding the Moscow Red Cross convoy delivering aid to Luhansk. In doing so, they have committed a crime of an extremist and slanderous nature. According to Trunov, the Moscow Red Cross had held a linguistic expertise establishing the calls for extremist activity in the disputed publications.
By way of compensation, the plaintiff requests to recover from the defendants 170 million roubles in the interest of the Red Cross.