Press review: US election criticism and Belgium against CETAPress Review October 25, 13:00
Russian deputy PM: Agreements on crude production cap to stabilize oil sector investmentsBusiness & Economy October 25, 12:46
Russia ready to extend Turkish stream after written guarantees from EU — LavrovBusiness & Economy October 25, 12:34
Pablo Picasso paintings come to lifeSociety & Culture October 25, 12:31
Minsk confirms it is ready to host Contact Group meeting October 26World October 25, 12:09
Moscow surprised as Germany places politics above economy — LavrovRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 25, 12:03
Terrorists cutting off Aleppo residents from humanitarian corridorsWorld October 25, 11:32
Animal abuse probe opened as 2 dolphins, seal and sea lion cub die in Primorye aquariumSociety & Culture October 25, 11:01
South Ossetia's military may be allowed to serve in the Russian army — defense ministerMilitary & Defense October 25, 10:37
MOSCOW, March 20. /TASS/. The Moscow City Court has upheld the complaint of the Moscow branch of the Red Cross against the ruling of a district court in Moscow, which refused to consider the organization’s defamation suit against 18 US and Ukrainian media outlets, said lawyer Igor Trunov, who is also the chairman of the Moscow Branch of the Red Cross.
"The Moscow City Court has upheld our appeal, ordering the Savyolovsky district court to consider the complaint," he said.
The lawsuit says that the system of humanitarian aid convoys for the population of southeastern Ukraine has caused a series of slanderous and false publications in the U.S. and Ukrainian media with a view of discrediting the legitimate assistance from Russia.
Trunov noted that US and Ukrainian media had unlawfully misinterpreted the reports on the December 25 news conference regarding the Moscow Red Cross convoy delivering aid to Luhansk. In doing so, they have committed a crime of an extremist and slanderous nature. According to Trunov, the Moscow Red Cross had held a linguistic expertise establishing the calls for extremist activity in the disputed publications.
By way of compensation, the plaintiff requests to recover from the defendants 170 million roubles in the interest of the Red Cross.