Putin orders Defense Ministry and FSB to ensure protection of Russia’s interests in ArcticRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 29, 21:46
Kiev aware of few chances to win in debt lawsuit case — envoyBusiness & Economy March 29, 20:52
Russian top diplomat dismisses claims about human rights violations in Crimea as liesRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 29, 20:23
Moscow suspects Jabhat al-Nusra could be used to topple AssadRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 29, 19:58
Lavrov reiterates there are no facts substantiating Iran’s links to terroristsRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 29, 19:40
Russia to upgrade helicopter protection system based on Syrian experienceMilitary & Defense March 29, 19:00
Lavrov says Ukrainian president wants to bury Minsk agreementsRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 29, 18:57
FIDE executive says Ilyumzhinov himself to blame over media buzz on his resignationSport March 29, 18:46
Russian top diplomat says Moscow ready to develop relations with WashingtonRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 29, 18:37
Speaking of the approaching 20th anniversary of Russian troops’ withdrawal from Europe, Lavrov said at that time the government sincerely wanted a new life where Europe and the West as a whole would see Russia as a partner.
“If there is no more Warsaw Pact and Soviet Union, and the troops have already left, why maintain NATO and all that attributes of the Cold War era,” he said. But “the hopes remained unfulfilled”.
“As you know, NATO has not ceased to expand. It looks for the meaning to exist. Afghanistan helped for some time,” Lavrov said. “Now everybody understands that Afghanistan only weighs on NATO solidarity, as what NATO had no chance to success, and the problem of drug threat and drug production have deteriorated a lot.”
In this context, it was Russia that could give the organization new meaning of life, Lavrov said.
Then came Snowden and the Olympics where it was totally unclear what the West was dissatisfied about - the high price of the Games or Russia’s victory, the Minister said.
Lavrov lamented the fact that “with all the good intents expressed by Western partners in Europe” the Cold War “inertia and inability to resist the ongoing attempts to drive all Europeans under the NATO roof and make them talk to Russia in a harsh voice” persisted. This “short-sighted policy” was based on the wish to impose their own will at any cost, adopt sanctions against dissenters and retaliate for “independence and unwillingness to obey the unilateral, unipolar world”.