Ukraine’s ex-president ready to take part in court hearingsWorld June 26, 11:03
Telegram founder rejects watchdog’s demands as contrary to Russia's ConstitutionBusiness & Economy June 26, 10:37
Russian Culture Ministry urges Arctic tourism developmentSociety & Culture June 26, 8:27
Scientists call Arctic 'blank space' on world archaeology mapBusiness & Economy June 26, 8:13
Anton Siluanov: “...It's worth any price you pay”Business & Economy June 26, 8:00
Russia hopes Astana peace talks will produce memorandum on de-escalation zonesRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 25, 20:31
Russians’ real incomes up by 3% in May - Russian finance ministerBusiness & Economy June 25, 18:39
All doping tests of Russian players at 2014 FIFA World Cup are negativeSport June 25, 15:10
Police refrains from calling Newcastle incident a terrorist attackWorld June 25, 13:14
MOSCOW, May 12. /ITAR-TASS/. Preliminary results of the referenda on the status of Ukraine’s Donetsk and Luhansk regions show that these southeastern regions don’t want to entrust their future to the Kiev authorities that have discredited themselves, political analysts told ITAR-TASS on Monday in comments on the results of the Sunday referenda on self-rule in these largely Russian-speaking regions.
Why did the absolute majority of people living in Donbas come for a referendum and cast their votes for any type of statehood, just not for the situation when it is possible to name their own citizens as terrorists without punishment and begin to kill them unlawfully? Because patience of Ukrainian people has already snapped. Viktor Yanukovych Ukrainian legitimate President “The referenda were held because people remained unprotected as a result of disintegration of Ukraine’s statehood. Moreover, chaos was growing. That is why, people decided to take fate in their own hands,” said Nikolai Mironov, Director General of the Institute for Priority Regional Projects.
He said the referenda in essence “mean a vote of no confidence in the present Kiev government”. “Residents of these regions don’t want to live with it,” he said.
The activity of the Kiev authorities testifies to major misbalance of the interests that the government protects, the expert said. “These activities are carried out in the interests of certain regions and certain social groups to the prejudice of other regions and other social groups,” Mironov said.
“The situation, in which we have received de facto new states, is not surprising. And the Ukrainian leaders must blame only themselves for that,” the expert added. According to him, it is not important at the moment whether the new state entities will be recognized or not. “I think they will quickly create elements of statehood. And I strongly doubt that the Ukrainian authorities are ready to regain control over that region through the use of force,” Simonov said.
He said people in the southeast of Ukraine wanted to show that they didn’t want to live in a Ukraine like that and that they “don’t want to participate in the presidential election on May 25”.