Russian opposition figure Navalny arrested for 15 days for resisting policeRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 15:32
Duma Speaker points out Russian banks in Ukraine raided with EU’s ‘tacit consent’Business & Economy March 27, 15:21
Opposition figure Navalny fined $350 for unauthorized rally in downtown MoscowRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 14:36
Russian National Guard’s daily grindMilitary & Defense March 27, 14:33
Lavrov calls attempts to block Donbass ‘unacceptable’Russian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 14:25
Government reveals how much money Gazprom and Rosneft pour into offshore explorationBusiness & Economy March 27, 14:22
Defense Ministry denies reports of downed Russian military helicopter in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 14:03
Russian top diplomat believes US-led coalition should take steps to liberate MosulRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 13:46
Kremlin airs its views on 'mass protests' in RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 13:41
MOSCOW, April 11. /ITAR-TASS/. Attempts to impose one-sided interpretation of human rights norms discredit the very concept of human rights, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told Itar-Tass on Friday.
“Not a single state or a group of states has no right to monopolize the interpretation of human rights norms,” he stressed. “Attempts to impose their one-sided interpretation under the guise of generally accepted standards discredit the very concept of human rights to an extent that the mere words ‘human rights’ or ‘human rights activists’ are taken with caution.”
“It is still worse when human rights are used as a tool to promote geopolitical interests,” he noted. “And it is absolutely inacceptable when they are used in attempts to spare criminals from trial and punishment.”
“Examples are plentiful,” Gatilov went on to say. “At a recent session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, some delegations tried to justify a ‘right to peaceful protest.” And external support to such ‘peaceful’ protest was interpreted not as interference into domestic affairs but as advocacy of human rights, i.e. as legitimate actions. It was nothing else but an attempt to legalize ‘color revolutions,’ like the Maidan or what happened in Georgia, Kyrgyzsatn, or in Ukraine several years ago.