Head of Russian delegation to OSCE PA says Ukraine not ready for dialogueRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 25, 5:02
Russian baritone Hvorostovsky cancels concerts due to continuing treatmentSociety & Culture February 25, 3:22
Russian prime minister declares 3rd Winter World Military Games openMilitary & Defense February 24, 22:33
Russia to veto UNSC resolution imposing sanctions on Syria — envoyRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 24, 22:29
Ukrainian MP Savchenko arrives in Donetsk republic to visit Ukrainian prisoners — agencyWorld February 24, 22:25
Russian Defense Ministry surprised over German MPs reaction to Reichstag miniature plansRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 24, 16:32
Iraq's PM orders airstrikes on IS positions in SyriaWorld February 24, 16:09
Nord Stream 2 financing model to be ready by year end - OMVBusiness & Economy February 24, 13:44
Churkin left bright mark in history of Russian diplomacy, Lavrov saysRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 24, 12:20
MOSCOW, April 11. /ITAR-TASS/. Attempts to impose one-sided interpretation of human rights norms discredit the very concept of human rights, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told Itar-Tass on Friday.
“Not a single state or a group of states has no right to monopolize the interpretation of human rights norms,” he stressed. “Attempts to impose their one-sided interpretation under the guise of generally accepted standards discredit the very concept of human rights to an extent that the mere words ‘human rights’ or ‘human rights activists’ are taken with caution.”
“It is still worse when human rights are used as a tool to promote geopolitical interests,” he noted. “And it is absolutely inacceptable when they are used in attempts to spare criminals from trial and punishment.”
“Examples are plentiful,” Gatilov went on to say. “At a recent session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, some delegations tried to justify a ‘right to peaceful protest.” And external support to such ‘peaceful’ protest was interpreted not as interference into domestic affairs but as advocacy of human rights, i.e. as legitimate actions. It was nothing else but an attempt to legalize ‘color revolutions,’ like the Maidan or what happened in Georgia, Kyrgyzsatn, or in Ukraine several years ago.