Cardinal Parolin: Dialogue of Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches to help them feel unitySociety & Culture August 20, 8:27
Polina Dibrova, mother of three, wins Mrs. Russia 2017 beauty pageantSociety & Culture August 20, 4:41
Russian emergencies ministry plane returns from firefighting mission in ArmeniaWorld August 20, 4:39
East Ukraine conflict claimed nearly 3,000 civilian lives — ICRCWorld August 20, 1:56
Renowned Russian filmmaker Andrei Konchalovsky turns 80Society & Culture August 20, 0:48
One of seven injured in Surgut stabbing spree in critical condition — authoritiesSociety & Culture August 19, 23:51
Netanyahu expects to meet with Putin in Sochi on August 23 — Israeli premier’s officeRussian Politics & Diplomacy August 19, 22:47
Surgut attacker is identified as a local resident - investigationSociety & Culture August 19, 14:09
Combat module containing neural networks may become series in Russia in 2018 — designerMilitary & Defense August 19, 10:44
MOSCOW, April 11. /ITAR-TASS/. Attempts to impose one-sided interpretation of human rights norms discredit the very concept of human rights, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told Itar-Tass on Friday.
“Not a single state or a group of states has no right to monopolize the interpretation of human rights norms,” he stressed. “Attempts to impose their one-sided interpretation under the guise of generally accepted standards discredit the very concept of human rights to an extent that the mere words ‘human rights’ or ‘human rights activists’ are taken with caution.”
“It is still worse when human rights are used as a tool to promote geopolitical interests,” he noted. “And it is absolutely inacceptable when they are used in attempts to spare criminals from trial and punishment.”
“Examples are plentiful,” Gatilov went on to say. “At a recent session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, some delegations tried to justify a ‘right to peaceful protest.” And external support to such ‘peaceful’ protest was interpreted not as interference into domestic affairs but as advocacy of human rights, i.e. as legitimate actions. It was nothing else but an attempt to legalize ‘color revolutions,’ like the Maidan or what happened in Georgia, Kyrgyzsatn, or in Ukraine several years ago.