Activists in Berlin stage picket condemning Obama’s foreign policyWorld January 19, 21:17
Russian regulator promises to respond to any US restrictions of RT channelRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 19, 21:09
FIFA: Over 82,400 ticket requests applied globally for 2017 Confederations Cup in RussiaSport January 19, 20:17
Russia stands for developing legal tool to fight cyber hooliganismRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 19, 20:00
Russia is developing advanced hypersonic weapons — ministryMilitary & Defense January 19, 19:50
Former USSR leader receives Lithuanian court’s summons as witness in case over 1991 eventsWorld January 19, 19:29
FIDE chief says he plans to seek US entry after President-elect Trump’s inaugurationSport January 19, 18:56
Russian economy minister: Results of 2016 demonstrated adjustment to cheap oil, sanctionsBusiness & Economy January 19, 18:44
Russia ready to welcome Trump at economic forum in St. Petersburg — first deputy PMBusiness & Economy January 19, 18:29
PETROPAVLOVSK KAMCHATSKY, March 29. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia was ready from the very beginning to support the deployment of the OSCE monitoring mission in Ukraine, but its Western partners were demanding that its mandate should include a visit to Crimea, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told Sergei Brilev’s Vesti v Subbotu (News on Saturday) television programme on March 29.
Replying to a question why Russia had not been ready to support the OSCE mission, Lavrov said: “I would say that our Western and Ukrainian partners were not ready to support it.”
Moscow is used to the fact that the West interpreted everything in the opposite way. “We are used to this. Orwellian talents are still alive,” the minister said.
“Russia was ready to send the mission a week before the decision was finally made. However our partners were demanding with inscrutable stubbornness even though by that time everything was already clear to everyone that we should include in the OSCE mission [mandate] a trip to Crimea as part of Ukraine,” Lavrov said.
“One may essentially disagree with our understanding of the situation or may not accept the Russian Federation’s decisions that were adopted in reply to the will expressed by the people of Crimea and supported by their overwhelming majority. This is clear and that’s life. But failing to understand the real policy and the total pointlessness of the demands addressed to us at the time when we were saying that we would accept any decision to be made by the people in Crimea in their plebiscite, and telling us: ‘well, notwithstanding the president’s words, let’s write that the mission will go to Ukraine, including Crimea’ - that’s either diplomatic impudence or complete diplomatic incompetence,” the minister said.
“Given the ability of our Western colleagues to juggle words and interpret things, as they had proved on so many occasions”, Moscow insisted that instead of writing simply that the “mission will go to Ukraine”, the mandate should specify the cities and regions it was to visit, Lavrov said. “This list contains both western and eastern cities, and not a single town in the Crimean Republic of the Russian Federation,” he added.