Russia’s antimonopoly service initiates iPhone7 price audit — regulatorBusiness & Economy October 24, 15:03
Sharapova will be back in WTA rankings after 3 tournaments next year — officialSport October 24, 14:58
Ukraine's self-proclaimed republics against deploying armed OSCE mission to DonbassWorld October 24, 14:39
Rusnano says it has no business ties with Clinton’s campaign chairmanBusiness & Economy October 24, 14:33
Minister says Russia’s information systems reliably protected from cyberattacksRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 14:31
Kremlin gives no comment on alleged attack on Foreign Ministry’s websiteRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 14:14
Kremlin says has no idea of protest potential assessment program at Russian universitiesSociety & Culture October 24, 14:09
Russian, Egyptian paratroops practice operation to storm "militants-held" villageMilitary & Defense October 24, 14:07
Ukraine lodges protest against Syria’s recognition of CrimeaWorld October 24, 13:49
UNITED NATIONS, March 15, /ITAR-TASS/. Russian Permanent Representative to the United Nations Vitaly Churkin said Washington was hiding the truth about its role in the Ukrainian crisis.
“The world would learn many interesting things if Washington told the truth about its role in the occurrence and development of the crisis in Ukraine,” he said in the U.N. Security Council on Saturday, March 15, replying to remarks from other diplomats.
Churkin said that while criticising Russia U.S. Permanent Representative Samantha Power “spoke about the dreams and aspirations” of Ukrainians, but “why do you deny the people of Crimea the right to express their aspirations in a referendum on March 16?”
He urged all countries “to step aside from confrontation and embark on the path of constructive cooperation in the interests of long-term settlement of the situation in Ukraine.”
Churkin stressed that the existence of Crimea within Ukraine became impossible because of the legal vacuum created by the armed coup in Kiev.
He noted that “the exercise of the right to self-determination by means of separation from a state is an extraordinary measure that is used only when further co-existence within one state becomes impossible,”
“As far as Crimea is concerned, this case occurred because of the legal vacuum created by the unconstitutional armed coup staged in Kiev by radical nationalists in February 2014 and by their direct threats to establish ‘their order’ across Ukraine,” Churkin said.
He also explained why Russia had voted against the U.S. draft resolution on Crimea.
It could not support it because it is at odds with the right of people to self-determination enshrined in Article 1 of the U.N. Charter, Churkin said.
“We cannot agree with its underlying message that the referendum slated for March 16, during which the residents of the Republic of Crimea should determine their own future, will have no legal force. This reasoning by the authors of the text runs counter to one of the basic principles of international law - the principle of equality and self-determination of people set out in Article 1 of the U.N. Charter,” Churkin said after the vote in the Security Council.
He noted that this principle was “reaffirmed in the U.N. Declaration on Principles of International Law of 1970 and several other decisions of the U.N. General Assembly, and in the Helsinki Final Act of 1975.”
Russia vetoed the draft resolution. The draft proposed by the United States was supported by 13 member states attending the U.N. Security Council’s meeting on Saturday, March 15, with one abstention - China.
The latest version of the resolution proposed by the United States says that Ukraine has not authorised a referendum on the status of Crimea and therefore it cannot be considered lawful or serve as the basis for any change in the status of the peninsula. The document also urges all countries, international organisations and specialised agencies not to recognise the results of the plebiscite in Crimea.
Churkin said prior to the vote that Russia would block the resolution and stressed that Moscow was not questioning the principle of territorial integrity of states. However he recalled that “before 1954 Crimea was a part of Russia” and had been handed over to Ukraine “in violation of law and without taking into account the opinion of the people of Crimea.