Russia to host 2018 FIFA World Cup at highest level — MutkoSport October 22, 2:12
Wolf chosen as mascot of 2018 FIFA World Cup in RussiaSport October 22, 2:00
Warming in Russian-British relations not in sight over short term, says expertRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 22, 1:38
Ceasefire agreements signed with 15 more Syrian settlements — Russian Defense MinistryWorld October 22, 0:39
Russian State Duma speaker confirms readiness to meet PACE presidentRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 22, 0:15
Ukraine’s new anti-Russian sanctions to take effect on October 31World October 21, 21:22
Kremlin says Egypt’s rumored sale of Mistrals for $1 is ‘utter nonsense’Russian Politics & Diplomacy October 21, 21:13
Source: Mi-8 helicopter with 22 people onboard makes crash landing in YamalSociety & Culture October 21, 20:15
Source says 'Gray money' tax may cover up to 5 mln RussiansBusiness & Economy October 21, 20:07
MOSCOW, March 14, /ITAR-TASS/. Moscow welcomes European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso’s position on cooperation between Russia and partners in the Eastern Neighborhood policy and sizes it up as an attempt to justify the EU and to catch up with the pace of the historical process.
The Foreign Ministry issued its official comment on the speech Barroso made in the European Parliament Thursday as part of a discussion on Ukraine. He spoke extensively about the relations of the EU’s eastern neighbors with Russia.
He said the EU was not asking its eastern neighbors to turn their backs to Russia. On the contrary, it was urging them to maintain relations of good-neighborliness and to build up their traditional commercial ties.
Such statements could only be hailed were they taken out of the current context, the Foreign Ministry said. “But these utterances by the European Commission President are little more than attempt to offer justifications and catch up with the pace of historic process.”
“European Commission refused to notice the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia for quite a long time, while engagement in it determines the main rules for organizing trade relations with other countries,” the ministry said. “More than that, officials in Brussels got so much preoccupied with the process of pinning down partners in the Western sphere of influence assumed an ‘either/or’ approach.”
“Many analysts who are capable of taking a sober look at developments in Ukraine and who care for the interests of their countries, say that problem, which detonated the Ukrainian blast, was the EU’s inability to produce a realistic mechanism of collaboration with Russia as regards participants in the Eastern Partnership project,” the ministry said.
“Russia has more than once proposed a more profound thinking and joint efforts to flesh out the initiative on construction of a common economic space from Lisbon to Vladivostok and the Eurasian integration process as its foundation,” the ministry said. “These proposals continue holding legal effect today.”
“Along with this, the Foreign Ministry is asking itself how the following thing should be interpreted from the angle of view of a subsequent search for consistency in the actions and decisions of the European Commission President and his colleagues: the European Commission responded with a refusal to Armenia’s proposal to sign a political part of the Association Agreement in the autumn of 2013, saying that political association and a deep and comprehensive zone of free trade were possible only in a single package” while in March 2014 it decided to sign the political part of the agreement with the Ukraine separately from the rest of its provisions.