Georgia’s Orthodox patriarch to visit Moscow to mark Russian patriarch’s 70th birthdaySociety & Culture October 23, 4:21
Iraqi forces enter last settlement on northern approaches to Mosul — mediaWorld October 23, 3:56
Azerbaijan’s president says his country will not increase oil outputBusiness & Economy October 23, 3:29
Second round of parliamentary election to be held in Lithuania on SundayWorld October 23, 2:49
Russian Duma delegation to take part in BRICS forum, IPU Assembly in GenevaRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 23, 2:11
Ceasefire in Syria violated 44 times in 24 hours — Russian reconciliation centerWorld October 23, 1:36
Russian national delegation would be more effective at US election — expertRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 23, 1:09
Russia looks to produce Zika vaccine in Nicaragua — health ministerSociety & Culture October 23, 0:20
Russian diplomat calls to compare death tolls in Iraq under Hussein vs under US ruleRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 22, 21:00
“Deciding to hold referendum is a sovereign right of Crimea’s legitimately elected parliament,” she said, adding that “the right of people to self-determination has not been abolished so far”.
She told journalists that “Crimea’s authorities understand their responsibility to hold the referendum in accordance with international requirements, making it transparent and legitimate”.
Matviyenko noted that “if someone does not like the Crimean parliament’s decision, this is only a matter of taste, while what we need is a strictly legal evaluation”.
“I wonder why no one said that a referendum on Scotland’s independence, scheduled for September this year, is a priori illegal. We have not heard such opinions,” she said. “Then why should the people of Crimea be deprived of their legal right to self-determination?”
“Double standards have become so obvious that it is time to stop using them and to start speaking the language of law,” she said.
Matviyenko especially stressed that “when Russia stated that the current authorities [of Ukraine] are illegitimate”, it was guided “purely by Ukraine’s constitution and Ukraine’s legislation”.
“If we read the same Constitution and the same laws, there can be no double interpretation,” she said, noting once again that “there was an anti-government takeover of power” in Ukraine.
“We have detailed legal opinions, and not only from Russian lawyers,” she added. “And we will circulate them to the international legal community to let them say what they would disprove.”
A referendum on the Crimean Autonomous Republic’s accession to Russia as one of the constituent regions is due to take place on March 16.
Crimean residents will be asked two questions: Do you support Crimea’s reunification with Russia as its constituent member and do you support the restoration of the Constitution of the Republic of Crimea of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?