Russia, Turkey report 14 ceasefire breaches in Syria per dayWorld January 18, 19:17
Analyst believes removal of sanctions can be political bargaining chip with RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 18:45
Arctic Forum’s task is to change perception of region as source of raw material — officialBusiness & Economy January 18, 18:28
OPEC revises Russia’s oil production outlook downward by 110,000 bpd in 2017Business & Economy January 18, 18:20
OSCE says preparations for talks on Transnistria to begin in near futureWorld January 18, 18:15
About 1,500 officials may attend Arctic ForumBusiness & Economy January 18, 17:38
Russia, Turkey conducting first joint air operation against Islamic StateMilitary & Defense January 18, 17:20
Austria as OSCE chair to strengthen monitor mission in Ukraine — top diplomatWorld January 18, 17:14
Russian food inflation declines threefold in 2016 — Central BankBusiness & Economy January 18, 17:01
BRUSSELS, March 06, 2:58 /ITAR-TASS/. Sanctions have never been a Russian weapon, Alexander Grushko, Russia’s Permanent Representative at NATO, said on Wednesday after an ambassadorial meeting of the Russia-NATO Council.
“You know, sanctions are not our weapon. It is obvious that each time sanctions only drive the situation into a dead end,” he said. “We depend on each other too much, we are interdependent not only with our European partners, interdependence between Russia and Ukraine is still bigger. That is why, all those who are brandishing the bugbear of sanctions must first of all stop and think what a boomerang they would get back. Any such solutions, naturally, in no way strengthen the readiness for further cooperation. They only weaken it.”
According to Grushko, it had never been typical of the Russian side to work on emotions. “We hope the NATO countries would not toss the baby out with the bathwater,” he said. “We shall analyze what was adopted by NATO concerning cooperation within our Council and shall draw corresponding conclusions.”
As for political dialogue, in his words, contacts with NATO “will be continued in this or that format,” the efficiency of the political dialogue would depend on NATO to a greater extent.
“Any attempts to impose any ready positions agreed within NATO would ruin the culture of dialogue and would give no positive impetuses or signals for its continuation and expansion,” the Russian NATO ambassador noted. At the same time, he stressed that not a single NATO project served “the interests of either of the sides.” “They all are aimed, first of all, at counteracting common threats for both Russia and NATO, and the entire Euro-Atlantic space of security, which we consider indivisible,” he added.