ECHR rules not to revise its judgement on Beslan hostage taking caseWorld September 19, 19:18
Trump vows to 'totally destroy North Korea' if threatenedWorld September 19, 17:50
Russian top brass calls on US to not hamper Damascus’ fight against terrorismMilitary & Defense September 19, 17:49
Zapad-2017 exercise puts Russian army’s "nervous system" to testMilitary & Defense September 19, 17:33
Ukrainian conflict led to spike in hate speech, Russophobia — Council of EuropeWorld September 19, 17:00
Russian regions contribute scores of natural stones for memorial to Gulag victimsSociety & Culture September 19, 16:45
Warsaw police hunting vandals who desecrated Soviet military cemeteryWorld September 19, 16:39
Donbass truce first step towards lifting anti-Russian sanctions — German top diplomatWorld September 19, 16:36
Moscow court arrests man suspected of stabbing hiker to deathSociety & Culture September 19, 16:34
MOSCOW, March 01, /ITAR-TASS/. The consent of the Federation Council, the upper house of Russian parliament, to the use of the national Armed Forces in Ukraine pending normalisation of the situation in the neighbouring country does not mean that this will be done immediately, Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin said on Saturday, March 1.
“The consent the president received does not mean literally that he will exercise this right immediately,” he said, adding that the size of the Russian contingent in Ukraine was not in question.
“That’s not being considered now. One must understand correctly a) the president’s appeal, and b) the Federation Council’s consent,” the diplomat noted.
Karasin said that the Federation Council’s consent meant only that the president has been given the free hand in case the situation deteriorates. “Today’s consent given to the president for the use of the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine [pending normalisation in the situation in that country] means only that the president has the free hand [to act] if the situation gets worse,” Karasin said.
Speaking about the situation in Ukraine, he said that in a country where people are frightened by three months of outrage and where lawlessness keeps spreading, the situation “become increasingly complex.”
He believes that Putin’s decision will meet a correct reaction in Ukraine but may be distorted by Western mass media.
“Today’s decision [allowing the president to use the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine] is extremely important. I am convinced that it will be understood correctly in Ukraine but I do not rule out that it will be distorted as always by Western mass media which barely understand the processes unfolding in Ukraine both now and before,” Karasin said.
Earlier in the day, the Federation Council gave the green light to the use of the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine pending normalisation of the situation in that neighbouring country.
The MPs voted by show of hands and adopted the decision unanimously.
Putin submitted a letter to the Federation Council “in connection with the extraordinary situation in Ukraine, the threat to the lives of citizens of the Russian Federation, our compatriots, the personnel of the military contingent of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation deployed in the territory of Ukraine (Autonomous Republic of Crimea) in accordance with an international treaty, and pursuant to Article 102-1(d) of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.”
The letter followed the Federation Council’s appeal to Putin to take “exhaustive measures” to protect Russians in Ukraine.
“We have urgently summoned the house Council and thought it necessary to make a statement assessing the current situation in Ukraine,” Federation Council Chairperson Valentina Matviyenko said.
“Today there is a real threat to the life and security of Russian citizens living in Ukraine. There is a threat to our military in Sevastopol and the Black Sea Fleet, and I think that Russia should not be a bystander,” she said.
The main purpose of the Federation Council’s appeal to the president is to urge him “to take exhaustive measures, all possible measures, to ensure the security of our citizens living in Ukraine, help our brotherly Ukrainian people achieve stabilisation and channel the current crisis into a civilised legal track so that the agreements that were signed by the opposition leaders and the head of state were implemented strictly,” Matviyenko said.
She noted that members of the Federation Council “asked the president to take exhaustive measures to prevent further escalation and put the resolution of the political crisis onto a legal track so that those who have grabbed power did not hurry so much and did not trample upon the rights of people and different regions of Ukraine.”
In accordance with Article 102-1(d) of the Russian Constitution, issues concerning the use of the Russian Armed Forces outside the country fall under the jurisdiction of the Federation Council, which considers them following the relevant request from the president.
The Federation Council debates such issues after studying the president’s request which should contain sound reasons for his proposal.
The Federation Council chair then sends the request to the upper house’s committee on defence and security and committee on international relations, which prepare their conclusions.
After that the Federation Council studies the possibility of using the Russian Armed Forces outside the country at its nearest sitting after receipt of the president’s request. The president and the prime minister are invited to attend the sitting which begins with a report delivered by the president himself or his representative, followed by the reading of the conclusions made by the Federation Council committees on defence and security and on international relations.
A decision allowing the use of the Russian Armed Forces outside the country is to be adopted by a majority of Federation Council members and is then formalised in a resolution of the upper house. The document is forwarded to the president within two days of its adoption.