South Korea parliament votes for impeachment of President ParkWorld December 09, 10:18
Lavrov says Moscow is uncertain whether Iraqi Al-Qaim was bombed on purposeRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 09, 9:05
US Congress votes to make Magnitsky Act applicable to other statesWorld December 09, 8:18
Analysts assume Trump poised to improve ties with RussiaWorld December 09, 8:12
UN envoy on Syria suggests resumption of intra-Syrian talksWorld December 09, 6:42
US Senate prohibits defense cooperation with RussiaMilitary & Defense December 09, 4:55
Russia and Cuba sign defense cooperation program until 2020Military & Defense December 09, 3:26
Putin jokingly suggests Russia should develop teleportationScience & Space December 09, 2:07
Russian investigators conduct searches across Russia over doping casesSport December 09, 1:52
KIEV, January 25 (Itar-Tass) - Mediation in efforts to settle the internal political crisis is now completely unacceptable for Ukraine, as the mere fact of mediation may be perceived as a partial waiver of sovereign rights, Russian Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Ukraine Mikhail Zurabov said in an exclusive interview to Itar-Tass.
“It is hard to disagree that determining a realistic agenda for a political dialogue, consultations and even approaching any agreements is insufficient in the current Ukrainian situation,” he said. “External control over the implementation of agreements, a kind of arbitrage mechanism, may be necessary. This is quite possible, but so far neither of the Ukrainian political forces has officially declared its interest in mediation to help Ukraine arrange or intensify negotiations.”
Zurabov believes this situation is not inexplicable: “Fears are justified that it is difficult and maybe even impossible to find ‘an honest broker’ under present circumstances. So in the near term any mediation that will be hardly free of hidden interference in the domestic political process is completely inappropriate for Ukraine.”
“At the stage where certain agreements are reached, the issue of guarantors may emerge in theory,” Zurabov said. “Another reason why mediation is not a perfect solution is that for a sovereign state it indicates imperfection of its political and state institutions. And the fact of mediation may be interpreted as partial loss of an independent state’s sovereign rights.