US imposes new sanctions on Syria over suspected chemical attackWorld April 24, 21:23
Russian businessman plans to build sailplane to fly around the globe nonstop in 5 daysScience & Space April 24, 19:50
Roscosmos excludes three cosmonauts from space teamScience & Space April 24, 19:34
Russian Foreign Ministry: Terrorists in Syria may get chemical weapons from Libya, IraqRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 24, 19:05
US not ready yet to restart arms control dialog, Russian diplomat saysRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 24, 18:57
Court recognizes Russia’s Sports Ministry as affected party in WADA whistleblower caseSport April 24, 18:48
Elephant, giraffe and wildcats found among Muscovites’ house petsSociety & Culture April 24, 17:48
Putin calls for setting apart real anti-corruption crusaders from political show-offsRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 24, 16:34
Moscow court turns down Jehovah’s Witnesses bid to fight Justice Ministry’s banWorld April 24, 16:08
MOSCOW, January 16. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia's Presidential Human Rights Council (HRC) members believe that the idea to work out a code of conduct for human rights activists is senseless. According to media reports, the idea to develop the code of conduct was put forward by Vladimir Osechkin, head of the working group on the development of public control and protection of rights of citizens in detention facilities in the State Duma lower house of the Russian parliament.
“I don’t need the human rights defender’s code,” HRC member, head of the Agora human rights association Pavel Chikov told Itar-Tass. He said that codes of conduct cannot be binding. “Codes of conduct are in the moral, not legal sphere,” he added.
Another HRC member Ilya Shablinsky drew attention to the fact that such a code, even if it is worked out, would not be adopted, “Journalists, for example, have their professional organisations. For example, the Union of Journalists has adopted such a code. Human rights defenders cannot have such a structure, so who will adopt and approve it?” He is certain that “it is impossible to work out a certain single norm, the criteria of who can be a human rights defender.” “Say, Sergei Adamovich Kovalyov was called a criminal by many, some human rights defenders were called traitors, I mention only the most authoritative human rights activists. I don’t understand this idea to work out the code and see no sense in it,” Shablinsky concluded.