Azerbaijan’s security officers kill attempted suicide bomber in BakuWorld December 03, 18:04
Lavrov: first step under 1956 declaration on peace treaty is signing of itRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 03, 14:47
Bank of Russia disclaims reports hackers steal 2B rubles from its correspondent accountsBusiness & Economy December 03, 14:42
Moscow sees nothing new in Congress banning cooperation between military of two countriesRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 03, 14:41
Lavrov: joint projects with Japan to bring relations to new levelRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 03, 12:29
Defense ministry says Russia delivers humanitarian aid to Aleppo daily 'unlike UK'World December 03, 7:29
Foreign ministers of Russia, Japan will discuss Putin’s upcoming visit to TokyoRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 03, 3:37
President of Luxembourg Forum welcomes Russia’s attention to threat of nuclear terrorismWorld December 03, 3:11
Presidential polls to determine vector for Uzbekistan’s further development — CEC chairmanWorld December 03, 2:44
MOSCOW, January 16. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia's Presidential Human Rights Council (HRC) members believe that the idea to work out a code of conduct for human rights activists is senseless. According to media reports, the idea to develop the code of conduct was put forward by Vladimir Osechkin, head of the working group on the development of public control and protection of rights of citizens in detention facilities in the State Duma lower house of the Russian parliament.
“I don’t need the human rights defender’s code,” HRC member, head of the Agora human rights association Pavel Chikov told Itar-Tass. He said that codes of conduct cannot be binding. “Codes of conduct are in the moral, not legal sphere,” he added.
Another HRC member Ilya Shablinsky drew attention to the fact that such a code, even if it is worked out, would not be adopted, “Journalists, for example, have their professional organisations. For example, the Union of Journalists has adopted such a code. Human rights defenders cannot have such a structure, so who will adopt and approve it?” He is certain that “it is impossible to work out a certain single norm, the criteria of who can be a human rights defender.” “Say, Sergei Adamovich Kovalyov was called a criminal by many, some human rights defenders were called traitors, I mention only the most authoritative human rights activists. I don’t understand this idea to work out the code and see no sense in it,” Shablinsky concluded.