Police detain third suspect in Catalonia terror attacksWorld August 18, 9:49
Syrian army encircles terrorists near strategic city of AkerbatMilitary & Defense August 18, 9:05
Spanish police confirm four terrorists shot dead in CambrilsWorld August 18, 5:56
Russian nuclear submarine successfully test fires Kalibr cruise missileMilitary & Defense August 18, 5:40
Citizens of 18 countries suffered in Barcelona terror attackWorld August 18, 3:07
Russian cosmonauts successfully complete spacewalkScience & Space August 18, 2:37
Reuters: At least 100 people injured in Barcelona terror attackWorld August 18, 0:57
Krasnodar FC beats Crvena Zvezda 3:2 in Europa League play-off first leg matchSport August 17, 22:45
Putin offers condolences to King of Spain over Barcelona attackRussian Politics & Diplomacy August 17, 22:37
MOSCOW, January 16. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia's Presidential Human Rights Council (HRC) members believe that the idea to work out a code of conduct for human rights activists is senseless. According to media reports, the idea to develop the code of conduct was put forward by Vladimir Osechkin, head of the working group on the development of public control and protection of rights of citizens in detention facilities in the State Duma lower house of the Russian parliament.
“I don’t need the human rights defender’s code,” HRC member, head of the Agora human rights association Pavel Chikov told Itar-Tass. He said that codes of conduct cannot be binding. “Codes of conduct are in the moral, not legal sphere,” he added.
Another HRC member Ilya Shablinsky drew attention to the fact that such a code, even if it is worked out, would not be adopted, “Journalists, for example, have their professional organisations. For example, the Union of Journalists has adopted such a code. Human rights defenders cannot have such a structure, so who will adopt and approve it?” He is certain that “it is impossible to work out a certain single norm, the criteria of who can be a human rights defender.” “Say, Sergei Adamovich Kovalyov was called a criminal by many, some human rights defenders were called traitors, I mention only the most authoritative human rights activists. I don’t understand this idea to work out the code and see no sense in it,” Shablinsky concluded.