Russian Foreign Ministry: Terrorists in Syria may get chemical weapons from Libya, IraqRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 24, 19:05
US not ready yet to restart arms control dialog, Russian diplomat saysRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 24, 18:57
Court recognizes Russia’s Sports Ministry as affected party in WADA whistleblower caseSport April 24, 18:48
Elephant, giraffe and wildcats found among Muscovites’ house petsSociety & Culture April 24, 17:48
Putin calls for setting apart real anti-corruption crusaders from political show-offsRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 24, 16:34
Moscow court turns down Jehovah’s Witnesses bid to fight Justice Ministry’s banWorld April 24, 16:08
Swiss-based CAS upholds four-year ban on Russian marathon runner MayorovaSport April 24, 15:57
Teenager brings grenade to school in Dagestan, one killed, 11 woundedWorld April 24, 15:54
Foreign policy chief says EU ready to return to strategic partnership with RussiaWorld April 24, 15:45
MOSCOW, December 27. /ITAR-TASS/. This year, Russia’s unemployment level stands at about 5.5 percent, which is two to three times less than that of developed markets under International Labor Organization standards, the government press service said on Friday citing materials summing up the work of the Cabinet in the outgoing year.
However, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev does not believe it is necessary to stick to low unemployment figures at any cost, believing it’s high time for Russia to begin slashing inefficient jobs.
Speaking at a plenary session of the Sochi 2013 forum in September, he said “I believe it is now, during the period that we are going through, that we must make use of our very serious advantage, which is a very low unemployment level as compared with European countries”.
“That is why we must abandon the policy of keeping the employment level at any cost,” he said. At the same time, when making these “painful decisions” to slash inefficient jobs, “it is necessary to take a balanced approach, giving people a possibility to upgrade their skills, to learn a new trade”.
“Possibly some people (and this may be quite a sizable part of the population) will have to change not only their workplace, but also their profession and domicile,” he said.
“But all this has to be done, as it is only in this case that we will get a more up-to-date economic model,” he summed up.