Russian bombers destroy IS weapons and ammunition depots in Deir ez-ZorMilitary & Defense January 24, 16:22
Syrian opposition hopeful war in Syria will end due to Russia’s roleWorld January 24, 16:14
Aleppo's historical sights after Syrian civil warWorld January 24, 15:36
Russia, Iran, Turkey setting up ceasefire monitoring mechanism in SyriaWorld January 24, 15:30
US withdrawal from TPP will not change Russia’s agenda in Asian region — deputy ministerBusiness & Economy January 24, 15:12
Gazprom chairman says gas will follow oil in global energy balance by 2040Business & Economy January 24, 14:41
IAC says Boeing crashed outside Bishkek was in good technical conditionWorld January 24, 14:24
Syria ceasefire monitoring mechanism may be included in separate document — sourceWorld January 24, 14:11
Italian top diplomat urges EU and US to solve sanctions issue togetherWorld January 24, 14:06
BERLIN, December 3 (Itar-Tass) - Russia ranks 127th in the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) presented Monday by the international non-governmental organization Transparency International with headquarters in Berlin.
The index based on expert estimates of perceived public sector corruption in 177 countries ranks the states from 0 to 100 points, with zero indicating the highest level of corruption and 100 - the lowest (very clean). This year’s rating assigned Russia 28 points, as many as Azerbaijan, Gambia, the Comoros, Lebanon, Madagaskar, Mali, Nicaragua and Pakistan.
The index has shown Denmark and New Zealand are least corrupt, scoring 91 points, whereas Afghanistan, North Korea and Somalia rank last with eight points.
“The Corruption Perceptions Index 2013 demonstrates that all countries still face the threat of corruption at all levels of government, from the issuing of local permits to the enforcement of laws and regulations,” said Huguette Labelle, Chair of Transparency International.
The organization also described public sector corruption one of the world’s biggest challenges, Transparency International said, particularly in areas such as political parties, police, and justice systems,” saying “public institutions need to be more open about their work and officials must be more transparent in their decision-making.