Defense Ministry reports on Russian army's 2016 picksMilitary & Defense May 24, 11:32
Russia, US discuss Syrian conflict in round-the-clock mode — defense ministerRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 24, 11:01
Russia ready to help countries affected by terrorism in their probe — security chiefRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 24, 10:39
Defense chief names strategically important regions for RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 24, 10:29
Russian defense contractor develops domestic air traffic control systemMilitary & Defense May 24, 9:45
New radar system enters combat duty in Russia’s Far EastMilitary & Defense May 24, 9:24
Language quotas for Ukraine’s TV will only fuel tensions — media groupSociety & Culture May 24, 8:49
Syrian troops repel militant attack west of Palmyra — mediaWorld May 24, 8:08
Foreign businesses lack state guarantees for their investment in RussiaBusiness & Economy May 24, 7:55
MOSCOW, November 16, 23:47 /ITAR-TASS/. The State Duma adopted this week, in the first reading, a draft law clarifying cases of enhanced encrypted certified and enhanced encrypted non-certified digital signatures.
The draft law specifies which types of electronic signatures will be used in which situations from January 1, 2014. The document was necessitated by the need to avoid a possible confusion that could have occurred after July 1, 2013, when a legislative provision establishing three formats for using electronic signatures -- enhanced encrypted certified, enhanced encrypted non-certified and simple -- came into effect.
According to Deputy Chair of the Duma Committee on Economic Policy, Entrepreneurship and Innovations Viktor Klimov, the enhanced encrypted certified signature has the maximum degree of protection and will be issued only the centres accredited by the Ministry of Communications and Mass Media and will be equal to the handwritten signature of a person.
The enhanced encrypted non-certified digital signature has the same degree of protection, but it can be issued by not only by certification centres accredited by the Ministry of Communications but also by certification centres of foreign countries.
Klimov noted that the vast majority of government information systems should use only enhanced encrypted non-certified digital signatures. “This logic can be overstepped only when legal relations involve foreign counterparties as in public bidding or in the customs declaration process. The draft law makes exceptions for these situations,” he said.