Press review: Trump terrifies Western elites and Alibaba eyes partnership with SberbankPress Review January 18, 13:00
Kremlin knows nothing about Snowden’s intentionsRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:50
Russian lawmaker: McCain confirms US recognizes Russia’s growing world roleRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:42
Kremlin: Issue on Crimea status not matter of discussion for MoscowRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:31
Russia views Austria’s OSCE chairmanship program as pragmaticRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:16
New movie marks return of Russian cinema to India’s silver screens after 25-year hiatusSociety & Culture January 18, 12:09
Senator says Russia should not abide by ECHR ruling on adoption ban for USRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:00
Stunning Miss Universe 2017 candidatesSociety & Culture January 18, 11:46
Chinese Foreign Ministry: Beijing ready to boost cooperation with MoscowWorld January 18, 11:11
MOSCOW, March 20 (Itar-Tass) – Editor-in-chief of the newspaper Moskovsky Komsomolets /MK/ Pavel Gusev dismissed lawmakers' accusations that his newspaper carried sex advertisement.
"We've already had such a check; it hasn't found any violations. Let them check, we are ready. The accusations are groundless. There is nothing to prove," Gusev told Itar-Tass in comments on the request by United Russia lawmakers to the Prosecutor General and the Interior Minister to checks MK ads.
The lawmakers alleged that each MK issue carried advertisement of sex services with phone numbers of prostitutes and their pimps, under the guise of entertainment.
The group of lawmakers behind the request includes secretary of United Russia's General Council Sergei Neverov, his deputy Sergei Zheleznyak, and lawmakers Olga Batalina and Yekaterina Lakhova.
On Tuesday, lawmakers at the State Duma lower house of the Russian parliament demanded an apology from editor-in-chief of the newspaper Moskovsky Komsomolets /MK/ Pavel Gusev for the newspaper article which had criticized their colleagues, saying he no longer could be head of Moscow's Journalists Union and a Public Chamber member.
The lawmakers supported a draft statement on inadmissibility of abusing freedom of expressing by the mass media. The document was drawn by the United Russia faction. The house voted 300 - 97 for the document. The Communists and A Just Russia faction did not support the statement.
The article titled "Political Prostitution Changes Gender" was carried by the newspaper and sparked uproar. It targeted three United Russia female lawmakers Irina Yarovaya, Olga Batalina and Yekaterina Lakhova.
The statement said the article "overstepped all thinkable boundaries of cynicism, partiality and ordinary boorishness."
Liberal Democratic Party /LDPR/ leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky called for revoking the State Duma accreditation from the MK journalist, restructuring the newspaper and taking it away from Gusev. His bid was supported by United Russia deputy Mikhail Markelov.
But Communists and A Just Russia deputies said had it not been for Andrei Isayev's comments on Twitter, there would have been no such uproar.
It would be far more correct for those who regard themselves as insulted, to file a legal action.
"The scandal will only boost the number of MK copies," Communist Boris Kashin said. He believes Gusev will not apologize and that lawmakers' reputation will suffer a new blow.
Pavel Gusev said he had nothing to apologize for because he had not insulted anybody.
"I'm not going to apologize to anybody; because I have not insulted anyone. It's Andrei Isayev who should apologize to journalists. I have nothing to apologize for," Gusev told Tass.
He had complained about Isayev's threats against journalists to the Prosecutor General's Office and the Investigative Committee.
Isayev told Tass he did not regret his remarks on Twitter because they were "the correct, natural and normal reaction to a public insult of women."
Head of the presidential human rights council Mikhail Fedotov criticized the parliament's resolution.
"Lawmaker /from United Russia Party Andrei/ Isayev could have taken the matter to court or complained to prosecutors, the Roskomnadzor Federal Service for Supervision of Legislation in Mass Communications, or the public board for complaints about the mass media /under the Journalists' Union. However, he selected "the third way," Fedotov told participants in the international media forum at the Public Chamber on Wednesday, "why isn't the third way normally taken? Because it leads to a blind alley."