Sports arbitration court strips Russian boxer of 2016 Olympic silverSport December 08, 22:48
Russia, US military experts, diplomats to discuss Aleppo in Geneva on Dec. 10 - LavrovWorld December 08, 22:41
Lavrov says US voiced regret over shelling of hospital in Aleppo but somewhat hazilyRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 08, 21:48
Budget revenues from Rosneft privatization to be $11.1 bln — ministerBusiness & Economy December 08, 21:18
Lavrov, Kerry discuss militants’ withdrawal from Aleppo — Russian foreign ministryRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 08, 21:00
Lavrov: Combat actions in Aleppo suspended to take civilians out of cityRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 08, 20:56
Bach says WADA to play part in deciding on 2021 IBU World Championship in RussiaSport December 08, 20:44
Gazprom signs contract for construction of Turkish Stream’s first line with AllseasBusiness & Economy December 08, 20:03
Russian Energy Ministry confirms non-OPEC countries meeting date as December 10 in ViennaBusiness & Economy December 08, 19:59
MOSCOW, February 22 (Itar-Tass) – It is not serious to regard Russia as a country with an autocracy regime, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said in an interview published by the Brazilian newspaper O Globo on Friday.
“I do not believe we are an absolutely ideal society, a model state. We have our problems, we see and know them, we have a young civil society and young developing democracy. But to regard Russia as an autocracy where human rights are not respected, it is not correct, not serious, although such a view exists.”
According to him, “our society has varied, opposite views on, for instance, the events around the known girls’ band action in the church, so it seems to me it is not right to believe that there is some absolutely correct viewpoint,” he noted. However, Medvedev said, “there is one indisputable thing: every country has to respect the decisions of their judicial system. And when I’m asked about this case (of Pussy Riot punk group), I always say one thing: maybe the harshest punishment should have not been applied, perhaps it would have been more appropriate to take something less rigid decisions, but there is the court ruling that has entered into effect.