European court says sanctions against Russia's oil major Rosneft are justifiedBusiness & Economy March 28, 11:22
Finnish president stresses Arctic should be free of geopolitical disputesWorld March 28, 11:11
Blaze at Ukrainian ammo depot extinguished, residents return homeWorld March 28, 10:13
Serbia’s PM believe Russia concerned by instability in BalkansWorld March 28, 3:40
About 3,000 troops to take part in missile force’s drills in central RussiaMilitary & Defense March 27, 20:55
Russian footballers must ‘force own game’ on Belgium in Sochi friendly match — coachSport March 27, 20:34
UN denies rumors of Staffan de Mistura’s resignationWorld March 27, 20:16
Prominent Russian lawyer vows to look into detention of journalists during Moscow ralliesRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 20:05
Kremlin says world chess tournaments should go as planned despite FIDE’s presidential rowSport March 27, 19:32
MOSCOW, February 11 (Itar-Tass) – Community Party MP Konstantin Shirshov, suspected by the Prosecutor General’s Office of involvement in a crime, has given up his parliamentary immunity voluntarily, the party’s faction in the State Duma said on Monday, February 11.
Shirshov submitted a petition containing such a request to State Duma speaker Sergei Naryshkin.
On January 23, the Duma received Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika’s request for stripping Shirshov of his immunity.
According to the materials the Prosecutor General’s Office received from the Investigation Committee, “Shirshov may be involved in a crime punishable under Article 30(3) and Article 159(4) of the Russian Criminal Code (unlawful attempt to take possession of other people’s property on a large scale, undertaken by a group of persons by preliminary agreement).”
Investigators claim that Shirshov was also involved in claiming 7.5 million euro for an MP’s mandate, the spokesperson for the Prosecutor General’s Office, Marina Gridneva, said.
Vladimir Yudin, head of a department within the Prosecutor General’s Office, said at a meeting of the Duma Rules Committee on January 25 that the case in which Shirshov was incriminated had been opened on July 8, 2011. The MP’s aides Myasin and Karagod are already facing penalties in the same case, he added.
“The crime boils down to the fact that the MP’s aides, together with Shirshov, had preliminary talks with Chernikov with the aim of getting money in a fraudulent way for having ostensibly been able to include him in the [United Russia party] list of the 6th Duma,” Yudin said.
After that Chernikov met with Myasuin and Karagod several times, and “the money changed hands at the National Hotel.” The transfer of the money in a hotel room was recorded by a video camera, Shirshov and the other persons who were with him were detained, the money was seized,” Yudin said.
He stressed that “Shirshov’s remarks are recorded in the video, and there is a recorded conversation between Myasin and Shirshov, who were discussing a meeting with Chernikov and the transfer of the money.”
According to Yudin, Karagod and Myasin cooperated with the investigation and “gave detailed testimony regarding the circumstances of the arrangement”, including the fact that “the amount of money was specified for their services as well.”
The verdict to Myasin and Karagod has already become effective and the issue at hand is to bring Shirshov to account. “Since the case has already been opened, we are raising the question of obtaining your consent for stripping him of his immunity,” Yudin said.
Shirshov flatly denied all charges.
Meanwhile, the Duma Rules Committee advised the lower house of parliament to strip Shirshov of his immunity. His fellow party member Duma First Deputy Speaker Ivan Melnikov said later that, in the opinion of the Communist Party leadership and taking into account the gravity of the charges brought against Shirshov, it would be necessary for him to think about resigning from the post of State Duma deputy voluntarily.”
The State Duma will consider stripping Shirshov of his immunity on February 13, Melnikov said on February 11, after a meeting of the lower house’s Council, which determines its agenda.