Sports minister says RUSADA doping inspectors started testing athletesSport July 25, 17:25
Arctic shelf development tops agenda of Murmansk international business weekBusiness & Economy July 25, 17:08
Trump backs investigation into Kiev’s meddling attempts to sabotage his election campaignWorld July 25, 16:57
Erdogan announces deal with Russia on S-400 air defense missile systemsMilitary & Defense July 25, 16:16
Austria concerned about US attempts to achieve own economic ambitions via Russia sanctionsBusiness & Economy July 25, 15:41
Russia may appeal ECHR’s decision on compensation for defendant in Nemtsov murder caseSociety & Culture July 25, 15:23
Moldovan president, Russian envoy to hash over bilateral ties and breakaway TransnistriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 25, 14:43
US will either have to put up with North Korea’s nuclear weapons or use force — expertWorld July 25, 14:33
Kremlin refrains from comments on media allegations about Tillerson’s possible resignationRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 25, 14:03
MOSCOW, March 3. /TASS/. French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault’s statement, made after Russia vetoed the resolution on chemical weapons in Syria at the UN Security Council, misleads the public, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Friday.
"I have seen the French foreign minister’s statement (comments on Russia’s veto of UN Security Council’s resolution - TASS) and accepted it with deep regret since it was pursuing a goal, I am sure of it, to misdirect the people in France and all over the world."
"First, it was said that Russia blocked this resolution and found itself in isolation," he went on to say. "It is not true. Six out of 15 members of the UN Security Council did not vote in favor of the resolution. So to speak about any isolation is at least unfair and inappropriate."
"The JIM report (the OPCW-UN Joint Investigative Mechanism aimed at identifying those behind chemical attacks in Syria - TASS), taken as the basis of the draft resolution, was released back in the autumn of 2016," he said. "It did not contain any convincing evidence of the use of chemical weapons as there were just guesses, underpinnings and references to non-governmental organizations that had never visited the areas of alleged use of chemical weapons."