Original images vs. portraits on canvas: 'An artist's model in the camera lens'Society & Culture March 30, 17:24
Putin thanks CNBC anchor for correctly setting Crimea apart from UkraineRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 16:57
Putin says no plans to restrict rocket engine supplies to USScience & Space March 30, 16:49
Russia’s Space Force deploys high-tech space monitoring systemsMilitary & Defense March 30, 16:25
Putin stresses Russia’s military activities in Arctic threaten no oneRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 16:18
Russia and Norway team up to clean Arctic of nuclear wasteWorld March 30, 16:10
Putin: Corruption must be fought against, but using this issue to score points is wrongRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 16:07
Putin blasts 'worthless' allegations of 'Russian aggressiveness'Russian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 15:57
Putin comments on recent protests across RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 15:49
VLADIVOSTOK, June 18. /TASS/. Head of the Kremlin administration Sergey Ivanov says the information about alleged threats from Russia towards the Baltic countries is propaganda, the aim of which is to gain political and economic dividends. He has pointed to violation of the Russia-NATO basic approaches to relations in the alliance’s intentions to deploy additional forces in those countries.
"This is propaganda from beginning to end. I would say rough propaganda," Ivanov said in an interview with the Vesti on Saturday weekly television program. "Authors (of claims of the kind) must have looked at maps of World War II to see how the Soviet Army was attacking across Suwalki, and as if nothing has changed, as a scientific and pseudo-scientific reason put it on the table."
Statements of the kind emerge from a poor economic situation in the Baltic countries and the fleeing of people there.
"What is to be done? A well-known recipe: shout at the top of your voice about Russia’s upcoming attack, as it is only dreaming about enslaving the Baltic countries," Ivanov said.
With such policies, NATO may draw additional forces to the countries.
"What would mean even one battalion or one brigade at a new location? Hundreds new jobs. Additional revenues. It is profitable economically," he said.
The rotation basis of deployment, announced by NATO, violates the basic approaches in relations with Russia, he said.
"Well, what’s the difference: whether you have one unit permanently or it is being replaced every six months," he continued. "So to say, for example, there were Spaniards, and then come the Portuguese. They arrived right the day following the Spaniards leave. The combat readiness is not affected. Changing the order of the addends does not change the sum, you know the rule from school lessons.".