FIFA Secretary General on her mission and expectations from Confederations CupSport April 25, 17:39
Russia's Ansat helicopter to debut at aerospace show in MexicoMilitary & Defense April 25, 17:03
Putin points out Russian weapons' top performance in Syria helped boost exportsMilitary & Defense April 25, 16:33
Putin sets sights on increasing share of navy’s advanced weapons to 70%Military & Defense April 25, 16:14
Spanish Senate chief plans to meet with Lavrov during visit to RussiaWorld April 25, 16:10
Japanese prime minister expects progress in talks on peace treaty with PutinWorld April 25, 15:55
Teen bitten by pet lion strolling in Russia’s Volga regionSociety & Culture April 25, 15:42
Deputy PM Mutko says Russia ready to host Confederations CupSport April 25, 15:30
Russia to supply power to Lugansk Republic after Ukraine cuts electricity — sourceRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 25, 15:15
MOSCOW, March 27. /TASS/. Russia accepts no claims on the case of convicted Ukrainian ex-pilot Nadezhda Savchenko in the context of the Minsk accords on the political settlement in east Ukraine, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Sunday.
The spokeswoman commented on the statements that Moscow must release Savchenko under the Minsk-2 accords.
"Russia is not a party to the Minsk agreements. They are devoted to two conflicting sides," Zakharova said.
"We must exert influence on the conflicting sides and, likewise, France and Germany must exert influence on Kiev. That’s all. We don’t have to do anything else," the spokeswoman said.
On March 22, the Donetsk City Court in Russia’s southern Rostov Region found Savchenko guilty of directing the Ukrainian army’s artillery fire in east Ukraine that had killed Russian journalists. She was found guilty of the killing of VGTRK journalists Igor Kornelyuk and Anton Voloshin and illegally crossing of the Russian border.
She was sentenced to 22 years in prison and a fine of 30,000 rubles ($440).
As Savchenko said earlier, she didn’t recognize the court’s verdict but wouldn’t appeal against it.