Chinese missile frigate to be open for public in VladivostokMilitary & Defense September 20, 10:41
Ukraine’s Naftogaz files lawsuit with The Hague court over Crimea assetsBusiness & Economy September 20, 9:42
Both Washington and Moscow not satisfied with bilateral relations — LavrovRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 20, 7:55
Situation with Russian, US diplomatic missions stabilized — TillersonWorld September 20, 7:07
Russia has no doubt that US can do something destructive to North Korea — LavrovRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 20, 6:21
ECHR rules not to revise its judgement on Beslan hostage taking caseWorld September 19, 19:18
Trump vows to 'totally destroy North Korea' if threatenedWorld September 19, 17:50
Russian top brass calls on US to not hamper Damascus’ fight against terrorismMilitary & Defense September 19, 17:49
Zapad-2017 exercise puts Russian army’s "nervous system" to testMilitary & Defense September 19, 17:33
MOSCOW, October 14. /TASS/. Russia emphatically disagrees with the conclusions contained in the report of the Dutch Safety Board following a probe into the MH17 flight disaster, the deputy chief of Russia’s aviation agency Rosaviatsiya, Oleg Storchevoy has told the media.
"We’ve studied the document and I can say with responsibility that the Russian commission categorically disagrees with the report’s conclusions. These are fundamentally wrong and contradiction to logic is out of proportion," he said.
"It seems the commission was picking evidence. The report does not have enough facts confirming the trustworthiness of the investigation," Storchevoy said.
The international panel of inquiry investigating the July 2014 MH17 flight disaster has failed to provide any evidence the characteristic strike elements of a surface-to-air missile were identified in the debris of the airliner, the deputy chief of Russia’s aviation authority Rosaviatsiya, Oleg Storchevoy, told the media on Wednesday.
"The shape and chemical composition of the H-shaped strike elements have nothing to do with those presented in the commission’s report. It is essential to have officially published information confirming these elements were identified," he said.
Russia has no absolute proof of the fact that the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 plane was downed over Ukraine by a Buk antiaircraft system missile, Storchevoy noted.
The Russian side has invited members of the international commission on the investigation of the MH17 crash to come to Russia and familiarize themselves with the parameters of the Buk missile system but received no reply, he said.
"Our invitations to come to Russia and familiarize themselves with the original data and the parameters of Buk have remained unanswered," Storchevoy added.
On Tuesday, the Dutch Safety Board published the results of its probe into the MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine in mid-July 2014 and its results contradict the findings announced by the Russian antiaircraft missile system manufacturer Almaz-Antey.
According to the report the airliner was hit by a missile with the 9H314M warhead. Meanwhile, Almaz-Antey proved earlier on Tuesday that the Boeing was shot down by an older missile modification with different striking elements.
Almaz-Antey also confirmed the version that the fatal missile had been launched from the Zaroshchenskoye community controlled by the Ukrainian military and rejected the international commission’s version of the missile’s launch from Snezhnoye, a town that had been under militia’s control at that time.