Kremlin sees no threat in China's decision to deploy missiles near Russian borderRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 24, 12:21
Funds for exploration of Moon, Mars should be raised abroad — RoscosmosScience & Space January 24, 11:58
Syria talks in Astana to end on Tuesday — sourceWorld January 24, 11:50
Syrian opposition says no plans to sign Astana meeting communiqueWorld January 24, 10:34
Astana talks may continue on Wednesday, Syrian opposition saysWorld January 24, 9:14
Syria peace talks in Astana enter second dayWorld January 24, 8:52
China deploys intercontinental missiles near Russian border — mediaWorld January 24, 7:58
Russian army engineers defuse almost 500 improvised explosives in eastern AleppoMilitary & Defense January 24, 6:56
Printing house in Kiev releases map of Ukraine leaving out CrimeaWorld January 24, 4:34
MOSCOW, October 2. /TASS/. Members of the US-led anti-terrorist coalition should make up their minds at an early date whom to fight: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad or the Islamic State terrorist group, head of the Federation Council upper house International Affairs Committee Konstantin Kosachev wrote in his blog on Friday.
"If we discard propaganda workpieces, the Westerners’ dilemma, which there is no escaping, comes to the surface: Their coalition — is it anti-terrorist or anti-Assad?" he noted, adding that "the West was trying until the last moment to solve both problems simultaneously — those of Assad and of terrorists."
"However, the two decisions do not coincide. Moreover, they are mutually exclusive. The elimination of one factor would inevitably strengthen the other," he wrote.
The lawmaker also recalled that US support for the opposition — the mujahideen in Afghanistan among whom was notorious "freedom fighter" Osama bin Laden — many years later resulted in the bloodiest terrorist attacks in US history.
"And this is a lesson for everyone: there are no ‘good’ terrorists. Terrorists are certainly the worst of all evils," Kosachev added.